Entrepreneurial orientation, appropriability regimes and innovation performance

International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 153-166

  Jantunen, Ari ^a   Hurmelinna Laukkanen, Pia ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Appropriability regime; Entrepreneurial orientation; Innovation performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747012944     PISSN: 14794853     EISSN: 14794861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJLIC.2006.010329     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ahuja, G. and Katila, R. (2004) 'Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp.887-907.
2. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977) 'Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys', Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.396-402.
3. Arrow, K. (1962) 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention', in R.R.Nelson (Ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity and Social Factors, Princeton University Press.
4. Arundel, A. (2001) 'The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation', Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.611-624.
5. Atuahene-Gima, K. and Ko, A. (2001) 'An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation', Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.54-74.
6. Bekkers, R., Verspagen, B. and Smits, J. (2002) 'Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM', Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 26, pp.171-188.
7. Boldrin, M. and Levine, D.K. (2002) 'The case against intellectual property', AEA Papers and Proceedings, May, pp.209-222.
8. Brush, T.H., Bromiley, P. and Hendrickx, M. (1999) 'The relative influence of industry and corporation on business segment performance: an alternative estimate', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp.519-547.
9. Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T. and Zhao, Y. (2002) 'Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance', Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.515-524.
10. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. and Tsakanikas, A. (2004) 'Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?', Technovation, Vol. 24, pp.29-39.
11. Cockburn, I. and Griliches, Z. (1988) 'The estimation and measurement of spillover effects of R&D investment. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents', AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp.419-423.
12. Cohen, W.M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002) 'R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States', Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.1349-1367.
13. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2000) 'Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)', Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
14. Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1988) 'The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style', Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.217-234.
15. Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1989) 'Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.75-87.
16. Cristini, A., Gaj, A., Labory, S. and Leoni, R. (2004) 'Dynamic organizational capabilities: a unifying framework for new work practices, product innovation and competences formation', Rivista di Politica Economica, Vol. 94, Nos. 1-2, pp.243-286.
17. Danneels, E. (2003) 'Tight-loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp.559-576.
18. Day, G.S. (1994) 'The capabilities of market-driven organizations', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp.37-52.
19. Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J. and Lane, P.J. (2003) 'Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship', Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp.351-378.
20. Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T. and Covin, J.G. (1997) 'Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.2-23.
21. Galende, J. and de la Fuente, J.M. (2003) 'Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour', Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp.715-736.
22. Garg, V.K., Walters, B.A. and Priem, R.L. (2003) 'Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 8, pp.725-744.
23. Goel, R.K. (1995) 'Spillovers, rivalry and R&D investment', Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp.71-76.
24. Hair, Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
25. Harabi, N. (1995) 'Appropriability of technical innovations. An empirical analysis', Research Policy, Vol. 24, pp.981-992.
26. Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2001) 'Guest editors' introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, Nos. 6-7, pp.479-491.
27. Hult, G.T.M., Hurley, R.F. and Knight, G.A. (2004) 'Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance', Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, pp.429-438.
28. Hurmelinna P., Jauhiainen, T. and Kyläheiko, K. (2003) 'The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations', Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT 2003, Nancy, France, 13-15 May.
29. Jantunen, A. (2005) 'Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study', European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 8, No. 3.
30. Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. (1993) 'Market orientation: antecedents and consequences', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp.53-70.
31. Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1995) 'On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities', Research Policy, Vol. 24, pp.185-205.
32. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) 'Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology', Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.383-397.
33. Lee, C., Lee, K. and Pennings, J.M. (2001) 'Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, Nos. 6-7, pp.615-640.
34. Lemley, M. (2002) 'Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organizations', California Law Review, Vol. 90, pp.1889-1980.
35. Levin, R.C. (1988) 'Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance', The American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp.424-428.
36. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1987) 'Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3, pp.783-831.
37. Lorenz, E., Michie, J. and Wilkinson, F. (2004) 'HRM complementarities and innovative performance in French and British industry', in J.L. Christensen and B-Å. Lundvall (Eds.) Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance, Elsevier.
38. Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996) 'Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.135-172.
39. Lundvall, B-Å. (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
40. Martin, X. and Solomon, R. (2003) 'Tacitness, learning, and international expansion: a study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry', Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.297-311.
41. Mauri, A.J. and Michaels, M.P. (1998) 'Firm and industry effects within strategic management: an empirical examination', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp.211-219.
42. Miller, D. and Droge, C. (1986) 'Psychological and traditional determinants of structure', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp.539-560.
43. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1982) 'Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.1-25.
44. Naman, J.L. and Slevin, D.P. (1993) 'Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.137-154.
45. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. OECD (1997) Oslo Manual - Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
48. Pavitt, K. (1998) 'Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't', Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp.433-452.
49. Riggs, W. and von Hippel, E. (1994) 'Incentives to innovate and sources of innovation: the case of scientific instruments', Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp.459-469.
50. Rumelt, R.P. (1991) 'How much does industry matter?', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp.167-185.
51. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999) Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
52. Sinkula, J. (1994) 'Market information processing and organizational learning', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp.35-45.
53. Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (2000) 'The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: a balanced replication', Journal of Business Research, Vol. 48, pp.69-73.
54. Spence, M. (1984) 'Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance', Econometrica, Vol. 52, pp.101-121.
55. Teece, D.J. (1986) 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy', Research Policy, Vol. 15, pp.285-305.
56. Teece, D.J. (1995) 'Firm organization, industrial structure and technological innovation', Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation Working Paper No. 95-8, University of California, Berkeley.
57. Teece, D.J. (1998) 'Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets', California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.55-79.
58. Teece, D.J. (2000) Managing Intellectual capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Teece, D.J. (2003) 'Explicating dynamic capabilities: asset selection, coordination, and entrepreneurship in strategic management theory', Business and Public Policy Working Paper BPP-98, University of California, Berkeley.
60. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) 'Dynamic capabilities and strategic management', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp.509-533.
61. Tzokas, N., Carter, S. and Kyriazopoulos, P. (2001) 'Marketing and entrepreneurial orientation in small firms', Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 19-33.
62. van Dijk, M. (2000) 'Technological regimes and industrial dynamics: the evidence from Dutch manufacturing', Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 173-194.
63. Wiklund, J. (1998) 'Small firm growth and performance: entrepreneurship and beyond', Doctoral Dissertation, Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
64. Wiklund, J. (1999) 'The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation - performance relationship', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.37-48.
65. Wiklund, J. and Shepherd, D. (2005) 'Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach', Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20, pp.71-91.
66. Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G. (1995) 'Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship - performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis', Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.43-58.
67. Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995) 'Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test', Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.76-92.