Three-Dimensional Vertebral Motions Produced by Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 425-436

  Keller, Tony S ^a   Colloca, Christopher J ^b   Moore, Robert J ^c   Gunzburg, Robert ^d   Harrison, Deed E ^e   Harrison, Donald D ^e  

^a Musculoskeletal Research Foundation   (Canada)

^b Biomechanics Laboratory   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCE   (Australia)

^d Eeuwfeestkliniek   (Belgium)

^e Chiropractic Biophysics Non profit Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Chiropractic; Manipulation, Spinal; Mechanical Force; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FLUOROSCOPY; INSTRUMENT; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC MANIPULATION; RANDOMIZATION; SHEEP; SPINE; SPINE MOBILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ACCELERATION; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MANIPULATION, CHIROPRACTIC; MOTION; SHEEP; SPINE;

EID: 33747008945     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Shekelle P., Markovich M., and Louie R. Comparing the costs between provider types of episodes of back pain care. Spine 20 (1995) 221-226
2. Triano J. The mechanics of spinal manipulation. In: Herzog W. (Ed). Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation (2000), Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 92-190
3. Haldeman S., Chapman-Smith D., and Petersen D. Guidelines for chiropractic quality assurance and practice parameters (1993), Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg (Md)
4. Christensen M., Kerkoff D., and Kollach M. Job analysis of chiropractic 2000 (2000), National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Greeley (Colo)
5. Cooperstein R., Perle S., Gatterman M., Lantz C., and Schneider M. Chiropractic technique procedures for specific low back conditions: characterizing the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24 (2001) 407-424
6. Gatterman M., Cooperstein R., Lantz C., Perle S., and Schneider M. Rating specific chiropractic technique procedures for common low back conditions. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24 (2001) 449-456
7. Shekelle P., Adams A., Chassin M., Hurwitz E., and Brook R. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med 117 (1992) 590-598
8. Koes B., Assendelft W., van der Heijden G., and Bouter L. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. an updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine 21 (1996) 2860-2871
9. Skargren E., Carlsson P., and Oberg B. One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain. Subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health care utilization. Spine 23 (1998) 1875-1883
10. Hurwitz E., Aker P., Adams A., Meeker W., and Shekelle P. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine 21 (1996) 1746-1759
11. Nilsson N. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 435-440
12. Boline P., Kassak K., Bronfort G., Nelson C., and Anderson A. Spinal manipulation vs. amitriptyline for the treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 148-154
13. Gemmell H., and Jacobson B. The immediate effect of activator vs. meric adjustment on acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 453-456
14. Yurkiw D., and Mior S. Comparison of two chiropractic techniques on pain and lateral flexion in neck pain patients: a pilot study. Chiropr Tech 8 (1996) 155-162
15. Wood T., Colloca C., and Matthews R. A pilot randomized clinical trial on the relative effect of instrumental (MFMA) versus manual (HVLA) manipulation in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24 (2001) 260-271
16. Herzog W. The mechanical, neuromuscular, and physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation. In: Herzog W. (Ed). Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation (2000), Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 191-207
17. Keller T., and Colloca C. Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography: a comparative clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 23 (2000) 585-595
18. Colloca C., and Keller T. Electromyographic reflex response to mechanical force, manually-assisted spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 26 (2001) 1117-1124
19. Colloca C., Keller T., and Gunzburg R. Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 1-15
20. Colloca C., Keller T., Black P., Normand M., Harrison D., and Harrison D. Comparison of mechanical force of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instruments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) 414-422
21. Colloca C., Keller T., Moore R., Gunzburg R., Harrison D., and Harrison D. Experimentally induced disc degeneration reduces vertebral motions and neuromuscular responses during lumbar spinal manipulation: an animal model. 8th biennial congress of the world federation of chiropractic, international conference on chiropractic research; 2005 June 16-18; Sydney, Australia (2005), World Federation of Chiropractic, Toronto 171-173
22. Colloca C., Keller T., Harrison D., Moore R., Gunzburg R., and Harrison D. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21 (2006) 254-262
23. Keller T., Colloca C., and Fuhr A. In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 23 (2000) 521-530
24. Keller T., Colloca C., and Beliveau J. Force-deformation response of the lumbar spine: a sagittal plane model of posteroanterior manipulation and mobilization. Clin Biomech 17 (2002) 185-196
25. Herzog W., Kats M., and Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine 26 (2001) 2105-2110
26. Keller T., Colloca C., and Fuhr A. Validation of the force and frequency characteristics of the activator adjusting instrument: effectiveness as a mechanical impedance measurement tool. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22 (1999) 75-86
27. Kirstukas S., and Backman J. Physician-applied contact pressure and table force response during unilateral thoracic manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22 (1999) 269-279
28. Triano J., and Schultz A. Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 22 (1997) 1955-1964
29. Herzog W., Conway P., Kawchuk G., Zhang Y., and Hasler E. Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 18 (1993) 1206-1212
30. Hessell B., Herzog W., Conway P., and McEwen M. Experimental measurement of the force exerted during spinal manipulation using the Thompson technique. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 13 (1990) 448-453
31. Kawchuk G., and Herzog W. Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 16 (1993) 573-577
32. Kawchuk G., Herzog W., and Hasler E. Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15 (1992) 275-278
33. Fuhr A.W., and Smith D.B. Accuracy of piezoelectric accelerometers measuring displacement of a spinal adjusting instrument. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 9 (1986) 15-21
34. Smith D., Fuhr A., and Davis B. Skin accelerometer displacement and relative bone movement of adjacent vertebrae in response to chiropractic percussion thrusts. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 12 (1989) 26-37
35. Keller T., Colloca C., and Gunzburg R. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 (2003) 567-578
36. Nathan M., and Keller T. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 17 (1994) 431-441
37. Keller T., and Colloca C. A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25 (2002) 485-496
38. Keller T., and Colloca C. Dynamic dorsoventral stiffness assessment of the ovine lumbar spine. J Biomech (2005) [epub ahead of print]
39. Fuhr A., and Menke J. Activator methods chiropractic technique. Top Clin Chiropr 9 (2002) 30-43
40. Fuhr A., and Menke J. Status of activator methods chiropractic technique, theory, and practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) e1-e20
41. Colloca C., Keller T., and Gunzburg R. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part II. Neurophysiological response. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 (2003) 579-591
42. Colloca C., and Keller T. Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24 (2001) 489-500
43. Colloca C., Keller T., Harrison D., Moore R., and Gunzburg R. Effect of spinal manipulation speed and force on vertebral movement and neuromuscular response. J Chiropr Educ 19 (2005) 4
44. Gal J., Herzog W., Kawchuk G., Conway P., and Zhang Y. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 20 (1997) 30-40
45. Herzog W. On sounds and reflexes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 19 (1996) 216-218
46. Sran M., Khan K., Zhu Q., McKay H., and Oxland T. Failure characteristics of the thoracic spine with a posteroanterior load: investigating the safety of spinal mobilization. Spine 29 (2004) 2382-2388
47. Wilke H., Kettler A., and Claes L. Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?. Spine 22 (1997) 2365-2374
48. Wilke H., Kettler A., Wenger K., and Claes L. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine. Anat Rec 247 (1997) 542-555
49. Kaigle A., Holm S., and Hansson T. 1997 Volvo award winner in biomechanical studies. Kinematic behavior of the porcine lumbar spine: a chronic lesion model. Spine 22 (1997) 2796-2806
50. Kaigle A., Pope M., Fleming B., and Hansson T. A method for the intravital measurement of interspinous kinematics. J Biomech 25 (1992) 451-456