Outcome indicators for the evaluation of energy policy instruments and technical change

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 2662-2676

  Neij, Lena ^a   Åstrand, Kerstin ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Energy policy instruments; Evaluation; Outcome indicators

Indexed keywords

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EVALUATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY; WIND POWER;

ENERGY POLICY INSTRUMENTS; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; OUTCOME INDICATORS; TECHNICAL CHANGE;

ENERGY POLICY;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 33747004684     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arrow K. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of economic studies 29 (1962) 155-173
2. Aronsson U. Evaluation of the Wind and Solar Policy Instruments in 1991-1996. (Utvärdering av stödet till vindkraft och solvärme 1991-1996, in Swedish) (1996), Price Waterhouse, NUTEK, Sweden
3. Åstrand, K., Neij, L., 2003. Policy instruments for the development of wind power in Sweden, (Styrmedel för vindkraftens utveckling i Sverige, in Swedish). IMES/EESS Report 46, Lund, Sweden.
4. Åstrand, K., Neij, L., 2005. An assessment of governmental wind power programmes in Sweden-using a systems approach. Energy Policy, to be published.
5. Azar C., and Holmberg J. Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability. Ecological Economics 18 (1996) 89-112
6. In: Bemelmans-Videc M.L., Rist R.C., and Vedung E. (Eds). Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments & their Evaluations (1998), Transaction Publications, USA and UK
7. In: Bijker W.E., Hughes T.P., and Pinch T. (Eds). The Social Construction of Technical Systems (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, UK
8. CGM Rationell Planering and Andergia, 1994. The energy technology research found: an analysis of support and subsidies for development in a market perspective, (Energiteknikfonden: en analys av satsningar och bidrag till utveckling ur ett marknadsperspektiv, in Swedish). Report R 1994:43, NUTEK, Stockholm, Sweden.
9. CGM Rationell Planering, Andergia and Nordiska Ledningsgruppen, 1993. Evaluation of the policy incentives for biofuled combined heat and power generation and for wind power. (Utvärdering av stödet till biobränsleeldad kraftvärme samt vindkraft, in Swedish). Report R 1993:29, NUTEK, Stockholm, Sweden.
10. Cronbach L.J. Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements (1980), Jossey-Bass Inc, San Fransisco, USA
11. Easton D. A Framework for Political Analysis (1965), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
12. Edquist, C., 1995. Government technology procurement as an instrument of technology policy. Report at Department for Technology and Social Change, Tema-T Working paper, Linköping University, ISSN 1101-1289.
13. In: Edquist C., Hommen L., and Tsipouri L. (Eds). Public Technology Procurement and Innovation (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London
14. European Commission, 2004. Odyssee, Energy Efficiency Indicators-a project supported by the SAVE programme of the European Commission, ADEME and national energy efficiency Agencies, Available at http://www.odyssee-indicators.org.
15. European Environment Agency, 2001a. Environmental Signals 2001, Report. EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark.
16. European Environment Agency, 2001b. Reporting on environmental measures: Are we being effective?, Report. EEA, Copenhagen
17. Feldman, S., 1994. Market transformation: Hot topic or hot air?. Proceedings of the ACEEE 1994 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Berkley, California and Washington DC, USA.
18. Feldman, S., 1995. How do we measure the invisible hand. Proceedings of the 1995 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.
19. Feldman, S., 1996. On estimating the value added through market transformation. Report prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the US Department under contract DE-AC05-960R22464, USA.
20. Garud R. On the distinction between know-how, know-why and know-what. Advances in strategic management 14 (1997) 81-101
21. Hedvall, M., Steen, P., Stenström, M., 1993. Evaluation of policy support to change the energy system, a consultant study, (Utvärdering av insatser till omställning av energisystem, en konsultstudie, in Swedish). Report R 1993:32, NUTEK, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
22. Hildén, M., Lepola, J., Mickwitz, P., Mulders, A., Palosaari, M., Similä, J., Sjöblom, S., Vedung, E., 2002. Evaluation of environmental policy instruments-a case study of the Finnish pulp & paper and chemical industries. Monographs of the Boreal Environmental Research, No.21 et al., Finland.
23. Hill M. The Policy Process in the Modern State. third ed (1997), Prentice-Hall, England
24. Hill M., and Hupe P. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice (2003), Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi
25. Hughes T.P. The evolution of large technical systems. In: Bijker W.E., Hughes T.P., and Pinch T. (Eds). The Social Construction of Technical Systems (1987), MIT press, Cambridge, USA
26. Kaijser A., Mogren A., and Steen P. Att välja riktning: Villkor för ny energiteknik (1988), Framtidsbilder Allmänna förlaget, Stockholm
27. Kamp L., Smits R., and Andriesse C. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy 32 14 (2003) 1625-1637
28. Kemp, R., 1997. Environmental Policy and Technical Change: a comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments, Wallaace E. Oates.
29. Lund, P., 1993. Evaluation of the wind power programme-VKK, Evaluation of support for solar heating and wind power, (Utvärdering av vindkraftsprogrammet-VKK. Utvärdering av stödet till solvärme och vindkraft, in Swedish). Report R 1993:30, NUTEK, Stockholm, Sweden.
30. Lund, P., Kasanen, P., Heljo, J., Nippala, E., 1996. Evaluation of the NUTEK's Programme on efficient energy utilization. NUTEK Report R1996:68, Stockholm, Sweden.
31. Lundvall B.A. National Systems of Innovations-Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (1992), Printer Publisher, London
32. Moberg, E., 1979. Evaluation of policy support for wind energy, (Värdering av insatserna inom området vindenergi, in Swedish). DEF-report nr 18. Delegationen för energiforskning, Stockholm, Sweden.
33. Neij, L., 1999. Dynamics of Energy Systems-Methods of Analysing Technology Change. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
34. Neij L. Methods to evaluate market transformation programs-experience of the Swedish market transformation program. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 67-79
35. Neij L., and Öfverholm E. Strategies for improving energy efficiency. In: Silveira S. (Ed). Building Sustainable Energy Systems-Swedish Experience (2001), Swedish National Energy Administration, Sweden
36. Nelson R., and Winter S. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6 1 (1977) 36-37
37. OECD. Towards Sustainable Development. Environmental Indicators (1998), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France
38. OECD. 10 Indicators for the Environment Report (2001), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France
39. OECD. Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressures from Economic Growth, SG /SD (2002), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France
40. Persson A. Technology procurement as a policy instrument, methodology and examples (Teknikupphandling som styrmedel-metodik och exempel, in Swedish) (2004), the Swedish Energy Agency (500448), Sweden
41. Prahl, R., Schlegel, J., 1993. Evaluating market transformation, proceedings of the energy program evaluation: uses, methods, and results; 1993 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, August 25-27, Chicago, IL, USA.
42. Premfors R. Policyanalys (1989), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden
43. Rennings, K., Kemp, R., Bartolomeo, M., Hesselskamp, J., Hitchens, D., 2004. Blueprints for and Integration of Science, Technology and Environmental Policy (BLUEPRINT), Report distributed by Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsfurung GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
44. Rosenberg N. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
45. Rosenberg M. Strategies to quantify market transformation and spillover effects of DSM programs. Energy Service Journal 1 2 (1995) 143-157
46. Rossi P.H., Freeman H.E., and Lipsey M.W. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (1999), Sage Publications, London
47. RRV (Swedish national audit office), 1996. The NUTEK programme of energy efficiency-a critical review, (NUTEKs program för effektivare energianvändning-en granskning, in Swedish), Report 1996:44, Sweden.
48. Salamon L.M., and Lund M.S. The tools approach: basic analysis. In: Salamon L.M. (Ed). Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action (1989), The Urban Institute Press, Washington, USA
49. SRC International, AKF and Elkraft System. Handbook of the Evaluation of Energy End-use Efficiency Activities (Håndbog i Evaluering af Energispareaktiviteter, in Danish) (2002), The Danish energy agency (Energistyrelsen), Denmark
50. Suvilehto, H.M., Öfverholm, E., 1998. Swedish procurement and market activities-different design solutions and different markets. Proceedings of the ACEEE 1998 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Berkley, California and Washington DC, USA.
51. Statens Energiverk, 1985. Wind power-results form the Swedish Wind power programme (Vindkraft-resultat och slutsatser från svenska vindenergiprogrammet, in Swedish), Report 1985:1, Stockholm Liber/Allmänna förlaget, Stockholm, Sweden.
52. Stirling, A., 1998. On the economics and analysis of diversity, Working paper No. 28, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, UK.
53. The Ministry of Industry, 1995. Evaluation of the Programme for Energy Efficiency, (Utvärdering av programmet för effektivare energianvändning, in Swedish). Contractor Report prepared by the ÅF-group, Sweden.
54. UNFCCC, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Available at http://www.unfccc.ch.
55. Vedung E. Evaluations in the Public Sector-Problems and Solutions, (Utvärdering i offentliga sektorn-Problem och lösningar, in Swedish), Ds 1994:117 (1994), Stat-kommunberedningen, Civildepartementet, Sweden
56. Vedung E. Utvärdering i Politik och Förvaltning (Evaluation in Politics and the Public Sector). second ed (1998), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden
57. Weiss C.H. Evaluation-Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. second ed (1998), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
58. Westling, H., 1991. Technology procurement for innovation in Swedish construction, Report from the Swedish Council for Building Research (ISBN 91-540-5367), Sweden.