Flow feature aligned grid adaptation

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 787-814

  Qin, Ning ^a   Liu, Xueqiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive grid; Boundary layers; Flow feature aligned; High resolution; Shock capturing; Wakes

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; SHEAR FLOW; SHOCK WAVES; WAKES;

ADAPTIVE GRID; FLOW FEATURE ALIGNED; HIGH RESOLUTION; RIEMANN SOLVERS; SHOCK CAPTURING;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; SHEAR FLOW; SHOCK WAVES; WAKES;

EID: 33746999950     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1648     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Eiseman PR. Adaptive grid generation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1987; 64:321-376.
2. Nakahashi K, Deiwert GS. Self-adaptive-grid method with application to aerofoil flows. AIAA Journal 1987; 25:513-520.
3. Catherall D. The adaptation of structured grids to numerical solutions for transonic flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1991; 32:921-937.
4. Qin N, Zhu Y. Grid adaptation for shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction. AIAA Journal 1999; 37: 1129-1131.
5. Ait-Ali-Yahia D, Baruzzi G, Habashi WG, Fortin M, Dompierre J, Vallet MG. Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD. Part II: structured grid. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 39:657-673.
6. Borouchaki H, George PL, Hecht P, Laug P, Saletl E. Delaunay mesh generation governed by metric specification: part I. Algorithms. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 1997; 25:61-83.
7. Garimella RV, Shephard MS. Boundary layer meshing for viscous flows in complex domain. Proceedings of the 7th International Meshing Roundtable. Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, 1998; 107-118.
8. Nithiarasu P, Zienkiewicz OC. Adaptive mesh generation for fluid mechanics problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 47:629-662.
9. Habashi WG, Dompierre J, Bourgault Y, Ait-Ali-Yahia D, Fortin M, Vallet MG. Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD. Part I: general principles. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 32:725-744.
10. Dompierre J, Vallet MG, Bourgault Y, Fortin M, Habashi WG. Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD. Part III: unstructured grid. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 39:675-702.
11. Osher S, Salomon F. Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Mathematics of Computation 1982; 28:339-374.
12. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
13. Toro EF, Spruce M, Speares W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves 1994; 4:25-34.
14. Carpenter MS, Casper J. The accuracy of shock capturing in two spatial dimensions. AIAA Paper 97-2107.
15. Deconinck H, Roe PL, Struijs R. A multidimensional generalization of Roe's flux difference splitter for the Euler equations. Computers and Fluids 1993; 22:215-222.
16. Brio M, Zakharian AR, Webb GM. Two-dimensional Riemann solver for Euler equations of gas dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 167:177-195.
17. Cockburn B, Shu C-W. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general framework. Mathematics of Computation 1989; 52:411-435.
18. Wang ZJ. Spectral (finite) volume method for conservation laws on unstructured grids: basic formulation. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 178:210-251.
19. Shu C, Ding H, Chen HQ, Wang TG. An upwind local RBF-DQ method for simulation of inviscid compressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194:2001-2017.
20. Nakahashi K, Obayashi S. Viscous flow computations using a composite grid. AIAA Paper 87-1128, 1987.
21. Kao KH, Miou MS. Advance in overset grid schemes: from Chimera to DRAGON grids. AIAA Journal 1995; 33:1809-1815.
22. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1992.
23. Wilcox DC. Numerical study of separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 74-0584.
24. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes. AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.
25. Barth TJ. A 3-D upwind Euler solver for unstructured meshes. AIAA Paper 91-1548, 1991.
26. van Albada GD, van Leer B. A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics. Astronomy and Astrophysics 1982; 108:76-84.
27. Knight D. A fully implicit Navier-Stokes algorithm using an unstructured grid and flux difference splitting. AIAA Paper 93-0875.
28. Ait-Ali-Yahia D, Habashi WG. A directionally adaptive methodology using an edged-based error estimate on quadrilateral grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996; 23:673-690.
29. Tam A, Robichaud MP. A 3-D adaptive anisotropic method for external and internal flows. AIAA Paper 98-0771, 1998.
30. Sun M, Takayama K. Error localization in solution-adaptive grid methods. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 190:346-350.
31. Peraire J, Vehdati M, Morgan K, Zienkiewicz OC. Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 72:449-466.
32. Hanel D, Schwane R. Hypersonic viscous flow over a double-ellipsoidal body. Workshop on Hypersonic Flow for Reentry Problems, vol. 4, 1990.
33. Thibert JJ, Granjacques M, Ohman LH. NACA0012 Aerofoil, AGARD AR138, 1979.