Transit competitiveness in polycentric metropolitan regions

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-40

  Casello, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity centers; Mobility; Modal split; Multimodal modeling; Polycentric cities; Traffic assignment; Transit competitiveness

Indexed keywords

MASS TRANSPORTATION; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION CHARGES; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

ACTIVITY CENTERS; MOBILITY; MULTIMODAL MODELING; POLYCENTRIC METROPOLITAN REGIONS; TRANSIT COMPETITIVENESS;

URBAN PLANNING;

METROPOLITAN AREA; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

NORTH AMERICA; PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746972027     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bar-Gera H. Origin-based algorithm for the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science 36 4 (2002) 398-417
2. Ben-Akiva M., and Morikawa T. Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transport Policy 9 (2002) 107-116
3. Boilé M. Evaluating the efficiency of transportation services on intermodal commuter networks. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum 56 1 (2002) 75-88 published in Transportation Quarterly
4. Boilé M., and Spasovic L. An implementation of the mode-split traffic-assignment method. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 15 4 (2000) 293-307
5. Book of Business Lists, 2003 Edition. Philadelphia Business Journal 21 45 (2002)
6. Bureau of Public Roads. Traffic Assignment Manual (1964), Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DC
7. Casello, J., Smith, T.E., accepted for publication. Transportation activity centers for urban transportation analysis. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development.
8. Cervero R. American Suburban Centers: the Land-Use Transportation Link (1989), Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA
9. Cervero R., and Wu K. Sub centering and commuting: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1980-1990. Urban Studies 35 7 (1998) 1059-1076
10. Cohen H., and Southworth F. On the measurement and valuation of travel time variability due to incidents on freeways. Journal of Transportation Statistics 2.2 (1999) 123-131
11. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, 2000. 1997 Travel Simulation for the Delaware Valley Region, Philadelphia, PA.
12. Giuliano G., and Small K. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21 2 (1991) 163-182
13. Kuby M., et al. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A 38 (2004) 223-247
14. McMillen D., and McDonald J. A nonparametric analysis of employment density in a polycentric city. Journal of Regional Science 37 (1997) 591-612
15. Modarres A. Polycentricity and transit services. Transportation Research Part A 37 (2003) 841-864
16. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 323, 1989. Travel Characteristics at Large-Scale Suburban Activity Centers, Washington, DC.
17. Nelson/Nygard Consulting Associates. Land use and transit demand: the transit orientation index. Primary Transit Network Study (1995), Tri-Met, Portland, OR (Chapter 3)
18. Patriksson M. The Traffic Assignment Problem Models and Methods (1994), VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands
19. Pushkarev B., and Zupan J. Where transit works: urban densities for public transportation. In: Levinson H.S., and Weant R.A. (Eds). Urban Transportation: Perspectives and Prospects (1982), Eno Foundation, Westport, CT
20. Schumann J. Rail in multi-modal transit systems: concept for improving urban mobility by increasing choices for travel and lifestyle. Transportation Research Record 1571 (1997) 208-217
21. SEPTA. The Schuylkill Valley Metro MIS/DEIS (2001). http://www.septa.com/SVM_Web/Volume1/Chapter4.pdf (accessed 14.05.03)
22. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (1985), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Small K., and Winston C. The demand for transportation: models and applications. In: Gómez-Ibáñez J.A., Tye W.B., and Winston C. (Eds). Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy (1999), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
24. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 16, 1996. Transit and Urban Form, vol. 1, Washington, DC.
25. Transportation Research Board, 1985. Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, Washington, DC.
26. Transportation Research Board, 1990. Traffic Congestion and Suburban Activity Centers Transportation Research Circular #359, Washington, DC.
27. US Department of Transportation, 1997. Departmental Guidance for Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. Office of the Secretary of Transportation Memorandum.
28. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis - Travel Time Costs (2002). http://www.vtpi.org/tca/tca0502.pdf (accessed 30.04.03)
29. Villain P., and Bhandari N. Differences in subjective and social value of time: empirical evidence from traffic study in Croatia. Transportation Research Record 1812 (2002) 186-190
30. Walker W. Memo to File: The Enhanced Iterative Travel Simulation Process (2003), Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Philadelphia PA