|
Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 423-425
|
Is 'more' always 'better'? Moving towards optimal utilization and of high dependency and intensive care beds by selecting the right patients for admission
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
INOTROPIC AGENT;
ANALGESIA;
COST CONTROL;
DEMOGRAPHY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
EDITORIAL;
EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE;
FATIGUE;
FLUID RESUSCITATION;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HIGH RISK PATIENT;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HOSPITAL BED UTILIZATION;
HOSPITAL INFECTION;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INFECTION RISK;
INOTROPISM;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PNEUMONIA;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
SCORING SYSTEM;
THROMBOEMBOLISM;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 33746950556
PISSN: 0310057X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0603400422 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (11)
|