Quieting educational reform ⋯ with educational reform

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 337-352

  Greene, Jennifer C ^a   Lee, Jin Hee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Keimyung University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Evaluation contexts; Evaluation ethics; Evaluator role; School reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746945963     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214006291103     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Erlichson, B. A. (2005). Comprehensive school reform in New Jersey: Waxing and waning support for model implementation. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(1), 11-32.
2. Good, T. L. (2005). CSR principal perceptions of support from the state department of education. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(1), 33-51.
3. Graue, M. E., & Walsh, D. J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Greene, J. C. (2005). Evaluators as stewards of the public good. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 7-20). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
5. Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Hatch, T. (2000). What does it take to "go to scale"? Reflections on the promise and the perils of comprehensive school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(4), 339-354.
7. House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1995). Engaging children's minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Kozol, K. (1990, Winter/Spring). The new untouchables [Special issue]. Newsweek, pp. 48-53.
11. Kozol, K. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
12. Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High-risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge.
13. Pogrow, S. (2001). Avoiding comprehensive schoolwide reform models. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 82-83.
14. Pogrow, S. (2002). Success for All is a failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 463-468.
15. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Qualitative Research Methods Series, 30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Slavin, R. E. (2001). Response: The facts about comprehensive school reform. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 84-85.
17. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
18. Stake, R. E. (1986). Quieting reform. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Comprehensive School Reform program: CSR program overview. Retrieved August 26, 2005 from http://www.ed.gov/programs/compreform/csrdoverview/edlite-sld001.html
21. Willinsky, J. (2001). The Strategic Education Research Program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 5-14.