Comparison of two or more measurement techniques to a standard

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 472-482

  Proschan, Michael A ^a   Leifer, Eric S ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Bland Altman plot; Measurement error

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; MEASUREMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33746931623     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet (1986) 307-310 [Feb 8]
2. van Belle G. Statistical rules of thumb (2002), Wiley, New York
3. Snedecor G.W., and Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. 7th edition (1980), Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa
4. Lehmann E.L. Theory of point estimation (1983), Wiley, New York
5. Roy S.N., and Potthoff R.F. Confidence bounds on vector analogues of the "ratio of means" and the "ratio of variances" for two correlated normal variates and some associated tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 (1958) 829-841
6. Hawkins D.M. Diagnostics for conformity of paired quantitative measurements. Statistics in Medicine 21 (2002) 1913-1935