Cancer treatment reviews welcomes submission of the Cochrane Reviews

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 243-244

  Pavlidis, Nicholas ^a   Stahel, Rolf ^a   Clarke, Mike ^a   Djulbegovic, Benjamin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER THERAPY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA SYNTHESIS; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DATA BASE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM; PEER REVIEW;

DATABASES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 33746913120     PISSN: 03057372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.04.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Garfield E. Journal citation reports: bibliometric analysis of science journals on the first database. Instit Scient Inf 14 (1980) 12A
2. Garfield E. Fortnightly review: how can impact factors be improved?. BMJ 313 (1996) 411-413
3. Patsopoulos N.A., Analatos A.A., and Ioannidis J.P.A. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 293 19 (2005) 2362-2366
4. Djulbegovic B. Principles of research synthesis. In: Perry M. (Ed). ASCO educational session, 39 annual meeting (2003), ASCO, Washington (DC) 737-750
5. McAlsiter F.A., Clark H.D., vanWalraven C., et al. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?. Ann Intern Med 131 (1999) 947-951
6. Mulrow C.D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med 106 (1987) 458
7. Cochrane C. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org.
8. Jadad A.R., Cook D.J., Jones A., et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA 280 (1998) 278-280
9. GRADE working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328 7454 (2004) 1490
10. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2002.