Study on the prediction model of surface roughness for side milling operations

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 9-10, 2006, Pages 867-878

  Chang, Ching Kao ^a   Lu, H S ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Polynomial network; Side milling; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

CUTTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POLYNOMIALS; STEEL;

CUTTING PARAMETERS; MILLING OPERATION; POLYNOMIAL NETWORK; SIDE MILLING;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 33746907798     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-2604-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alauddin M, El Baradie MA, Hashmi MSJ (1995) Computer-aided analysis of a surface-roughness model for end milling. J Mater Process Technol 55:123-127
2. Lou SJ, Chen JC (1999) In-process surface roughness recognition (ISRR) system in end-milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:200-209
3. Melkote SN, Thangaraj AR (1994) An enhanced end milling surface texture model including the effect of radial rake and primary relief angles. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116:166-174
4. Fuh KH, Wu CF (1995) A proposed statistical model for surface quality prediction in end-milling of Al alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(8):1187-1200
5. Lo S-P (2003) An adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system for prediction of workpiece surface roughness in end milling. J Mater Process Technol 142:665-675
6. Wang M-Y, Chang H-Y (2004) Experimental study of surface roughness in slot end milling AL2014-T6. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:51-57
7. Lee B-Y, Juan H, Lin W-Y (2002) The predictive model of surface roughness in the dynamic Turning state. J Technol 17(1):31-36
8. Fulcher GE, Brown DE (1994) A polynomial network for predicting temperature distributions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(3):372-379
9. Barron RL, Mucciardi AN, Cook FJ, Craig JN, Barron AR (1984) Adaptive learning networks: development and application, in the United States, of algorithms related to GMDH. In: Farlow SJ (ed), Self-organizing methods in modeling: GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
10. Chryssolouris G, Guillot M (1990) A comparison of statistical and AI approaches to the selection of process parameters in intelligent machining. ASME J Eng Ind 112:122-131
11. Montgomery GJ, Drake KC (1991) Abductive reasoning network. Neurocomputing 2:97-104
12. Ravindra HV, Raghunandan M, Srinivasa YG, Krishnamurthy R (1994) Tool wear estimation by group method of data handing in turning. Int J Prod Res 32:1295-1312
13. Barron AR (1984) Predicted-squared-error: a criterion for automatic model selection. In: Farlow SJ (ed), Self-organizing methods in modeling: GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
14. Ivakhnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans System Man Cybernet 1(4):364-378
15. Farlow SJ (ed) (1984) The GMDH algorithm: self-organizing methods in modeling:GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
16. Miller GA (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81-97
17. UNLON TOOL (2003) UNLON Tool Catalog v 6