The contributions of anterior and posterior tibialis dysfunction to varus foot deformity in patients with cerebral palsy

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1764-1768

  Michlitsch, Michael G ^a   Rethlefsen, Susan A ^b   Kay, Robert M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTION; MUSCLE FUNCTION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA FRACTURE; VARUS DEFORMITY;

EID: 33746904374     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00964     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wren TA, Rethlefsen S, Kay RM. Prevalence of specific gait abnormalities in children with cerebral palsy: influence of cerebral palsy subtype, age, and previous surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:79-83.
2. Sutherland DH. Varus foot in cerebral palsy: an overview. Instr Course Lect. 1993;42:539-43.
3. Disorders of the brain. In: Tachdjian's pediatric orthopaedics. Herring JA, editor. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: 2002. p 1121-248.
4. Green NE. Cerebral palsy. In: Operative pediatric orthopaedics. Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1995; p 665-738.
5. Dehne R. Congenital and acquired neurological disorders. In: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, editors. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p 525-57.
6. DeLuca PA, Davis RB 3rd, Ounpuu S, Rose S, Sirkin R. Alterations in surgical decision making in patients with cerebral palsy based on three-dimensional gait analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:608-14.
7. Gage JR. The role of gait analysis in the treatment of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:701-2.
8. Kay RM, Dennis S, Rethlefsen S, Reynolds RA, Skaggs DL, Tolo VT. The effect of preoperative gait analysis on orthopaedic decision making. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;372:217-22.
9. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 1992. p 349-489.
10. Perry J, Hoffer MM. Preoperative and postoperative dynamic electromyography as an aid in planning tendon transfers in children with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:531-7.
11. Barto PS, Supinski RS, Skinner SR. Dynamic EMG findings in varus hindfoot deformity and spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:88-93.
12. Renders A, Detrembleur C, Rossillon R, Lejeune T, Rombouts JJ. [Contribution of electromyographic analysis of the walking habits of children with spastic foot in cerebral palsy: a preliminary study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83:259-64. French.
13. Wills CA, Hoffer MM, Perry J. A comparison of foot-switch and EMG analysis of varus deformities of the feet of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988;30:227-31.
14. Young CC, Rose SE, Biden EN, Wyatt MP, Sutherland DH. The effect of surface and internal electrodes on the gait of children with cerebral palsy, spastic diplegic type. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:732-7.
15. De Luca CJ, Merletti R. Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;69:568-75.
16. Perry J, Easterday CS, Antonelli DJ. Surface versus intramuscular electrodes for electromyography of superficial and deep muscles. Phys Ther. 1981;61:7-15.
17. Perry J. Pathologic gait. Instr Course Lect. 1990;39:325-31.