The John Prince Research Forest: Evolution of a co-management partnership in northern British Columbia

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 484-495

  Grainger, Sue ^a   Sherry, Erin ^b   Fondahl, Gail ^b  

^a John Prince Research Forest   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aboriginal; British Columbia; Co management; Community forestry; Criteria and indicators (C I); First Nation; Forest management; Forest tenure; Joint venture; Partnerships; Research forest; Tl'azt'en Nation; Traditional environmental knowledge

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS;

JOINT VENTURE; RESEARCH FOREST; TRADITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE;

FORESTRY;

COMMUNITY FORESTRY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUTURE PROSPECT; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

ECOSYSTEMS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; PINUS PONDEROSA;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33746899354     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: 00157546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc82484-4     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Beckley, T.M. and B.H. Hirsch. 1997. Subsistence and non-industrial forest use in the lower Liard Valley. Information Report NOR-X-352. Can. For. Serv., Nor. For. Cen., Edmonton, AB.
2. Berkes, F. 1989. Common property resources: Ecology and community-based sustainable development. Belhaven, London.
3. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Berkes, F., P. George and R.J. Preston. 1991. Co-management: the evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternatives 18(2): 12-18.
5. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. 1996. Collaborative management of protected natural areas: Tailoring the approach to the context. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 67 p.
6. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., M. Taghi Farvar, J.C. Nguinguiri and V.A. Ndangang. 2000. Co-management of natural resources: Organising, negotiating, and learning-by-doing. GTZ and IUCN, Heidleberg, Germany.
7. Brown, D. 2002. Carrier Sekani self-government in context: land and resources. Western Geog. 12: 21-67.
8. Brubacher, D. 1998. Aboriginal forestry joint ventures: Elements of an assessment framework. For. Chron. 74: 353-358.
9. Burda, C. and M. M'Gonigle. 1996. Tree farm or community forest? Making Waves. 7(4): 16-26.
10. Chambers, F.G. 1999. Co-management of forest resources in the NorSask Forest Management Licence Area, Saskatchewan: A case study. Unpublished master's thesis. Univ. Calgary, Calgary, AB.
11. Chuzghun Resources Corporation (CRC). 2000. Incorporation Documents. Unpublished documents.
12. Curran, D. and M. M'Gonigle. 1998. Aboriginal forestry: Community management as opportunity and imperative. Univ. Victoria, Victoria, BC. 43 p.
13. Delong, C. and D. Tanner. 1996. Managing the pattern of forest harvest: Lessons from Wildfire. Biodiv. and Cons. 5: 1191-1205.
14. Duinker, P.N., P.W. Matakala, F. Chege and L. Bouthillier. 1994. Community forests in Canada: an overview. For. Chron. 70(6): 711-720.
15. East, K. 1991. Joint management of Canada's northern National Parks. In P.C. West and S.R. Brechin (eds.). Resident peoples and National Parks. pp. 333-345. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
16. Fisher, R.J. 1995. Issues in forest conservation: Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development. IUCN and WWF, Bellegarde, France.
17. Grenier, L. 1998. Working with indigenous knowledge: A guide for researchers. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON. 115 p.
18. Groot, A. and M. Maarleveld. 2000. Demystifying facilitation in participatory democracy. IIED Gatekeeper Series no. 89. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
19. Hauck, M. and M. Sowman. 2001. Coastal and fisheries co-management in South Africa: An overview and analysis. Marine Pol. 25: 173-185.
20. Hawkes, S.L.E. 1996. The Gwaii Haanas Agreement: From conflict to co-operation. Environ. 23(2): 87-100.
21. Hawley, A.W.L., E.E. Sherry and C.J. Johnson. 2005. A biologists' perspective on amalgamating traditional environmental knowledge with resource management. BC. J. Ecosyst. & Manag. 5(1): 36-50.
22. Higgelke, P.E. and P.N. Duiker. 1993. Open Doors: Public participation in forest management in Canada. Report to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Assoc., Forestry Canada and Lakehead Univ.,Thunder Bay.
23. Hood, S., L. Rasaily and G.S. Timila. 1997. Community forestry: A program or a process? The interface between users and government. In M. Victor (ed.). Community forestry at the cross-roads: Reflection and future directions in the development of community forestry. RECOFTC Report No.16. pp. 165-174. Bangkok.
24. Huntington, H.P. 1991. Management and regulation of local subsistence hunting in Northern Alaska. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Univ. Cambridge and Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, UK.
25. Jaggi, M. 1997. Current developments in Aboriginal forestry: Provincial forest policy and Aboriginal participation in forestry in Ontario. Int. J. Ecofor. 13(1): 13-20.
26. Jentoft, S. 1989. Fisheries co-management: delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations. Marine Pol. 13(2): 137-154.
27. Jentoft, S. and B.J. McCay. 1995. User participation in fisheries management: lessons from international experiences. Marine Pol. 19(3): 227-246.
28. Jentoft, S., B.J. McCay and D.C. Wilson. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Pol. 22(4-5): 423-436.
29. John Prince Research Forest (JPRF) Management Committee. 1995. Memorandum of Understanding. Unpublished document.
30. John Prince Research Forest (JPRF) Management Committee. 1999. Memorandum of Understanding. Unpublished document.
31. Karjala, M., E.E. Sherry and S.M. Dewhurst. 2004. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest planning: a framework for recording Aboriginal resource and social values. For. Pol. & Econ. 6(2): 95-110.
32. Kiiti, N. and E. Nielsen. 1999. Facilitator or advocate: What's the difference? In S.A. White (ed.). The art of facilitating participation: Releasing the power of grassroots communication. pp. 52-67. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Kofinas, G.P. 1998. The costs of power sharing: Community involvement in Canadian Porcupine caribou management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UBC,Vancouver, BC.
34. Krogman, N. and T. Beckley. 2002. Corporate bail-outs and local buyouts: pathways to community forestry? Society and Natural Resources 15: 109-127
35. Landmann, P. 1988. Co-management of wildlife under the James Bay Treaty: the hunting, fishing, and trapping co-ordination committee. Unpublished master's thesis. U. of Laval. Quebec City.
36. Laverack, G. 2001. An identification and interpretation of the organizational aspects of community empowerment. Com. Dev. J. 36(2): 134-145.
37. Legat, A. and A. Brockman. 1991. Report of the Traditional Knowledge Working Group. Department of Culture and Communication, Government of NWT, Yellowknife, NT.
38. Lewis, M. 1993. Finding facts: the recovery of First Nation self-reliance requires building local organisational capacity. In D. Weir (ed.). Community-based resource development and stewardship. pp. 2-8. Centre for Community Enterprise, Port Alberni, BC.
39. Mitchell, R. 2003. Yunk'ut Whe Ts'o Duleh (We Learn from our Land): Discussion Paper & Curriculum Development for an Outdoor Education Culture-based Science Camp. Unpublished report. Fort St. James, BC.
40. Montagu, A.S. 2001. Reforming forest planning and management in Papua New Guinea, 1991-94: Losing people in the process. J. Env. Plan. & Man. 44(5): 649-662.
41. Morris, P. and G. Fondahl. 2002. Negotiating the production of space in Tl'azt'en territory, Northern British Columbia. Canadian Geographer 46(2): 108-125.
42. Mulvihill, P.R. and R.F. Keith. 1989. Institutional requirements for adaptive EIA: The Kativik Environmental Quality Commission. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 9: 399-412.
43. Murray, W. 1995. Lessons from 35 years of private preserve management in the USA: The preserve system of the Nature Conservancy. In J.A. McNeely (ed.). Expanding partnerships in conservation. pp. 197-205. Island Press, Washington, DC.
44. Noble, B.F. 2000. Institutional criteria for co-management. Marine Policy 24: 69-77.
45. Notzke, C. 1995. A new perspective in aboriginal natural resource management: co-management. Geoforum 26: 187-209.
46. Nurse, M. and T. Kabamba. 2000. Defining institutions for collaborative mangrove management: A case study from Tanga, Tanzania. IUCN Regional Office for East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
47. Osherenko, G. 1988. Sharing power with native users: Co-management regimes for Arctic wildlife. Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, Ottawa, ON.
48. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 280 p.
49. Peter, A. and D. Urquart. 1991. One caribou herd, two native cultures, five political systems: Consensus management of the Porcupine Caribou range. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 321-325.
50. Pierce Colfer, C.J., R. Prabhu and E. Wollenberg. 1995. Principles, criteria, and indicators: Applying Okham's Razor to the people-forestry link. Working Paper No.8. CIFOR, Jakarta.
51. Pinkerton, E. 1989. Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
52. Pinkerton, E. 1993. Co-management efforts as social movements: The Tin Wis Coalition and the drive for forest practices legislation in British Columbia. Alternatives 19(3): 33-38.
53. Pinkerton, E. and M. Weinstein. 1995. Fisheries that work: Sustainability through community-based management. David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, BC. 199 p.
54. Pomeroy, R.S. and F. Berkes. 1997. Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Pol. 2(5): 465-480.
55. Pomeroy, R.S., B.M. Katon and I. Harkes. 2001. Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management. Marine Pol. 25: 197-208.
56. Prystupa, M.V. 1998. Barriers and strategies to the development of co-management regimes in New Zealand: The case of Te Waihora. Human Organization 57(2): 134-144.
57. Roberts, K. 1994. Co-management: Learning from the experience of the Wildlife Management Advisory Council for the Northwest Territories. Unpublished master's thesis. U. of Calgary. Calgary, AB.
58. Sekhar, N.U. 2000. Decentralized natural resource management: From state to co-management in India. J. Env. Plan. & Manage. 43(1): 123-138.
59. Sen, S. and J.R. Nielsen. 1996. Fisheries co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Pol. 20(5): 405-418.
60. Sherry, E.E. 2002. Constructing partnership: A Delphi study of shared resources management in the northern Yukon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Northern BC, Prince George, BC.
61. Sherry, E.E. and G. Fondahl. 2003. Criteria Affecting the Success of Co-management: New directions for improved forest management partnerships in BC. Unpublished report, Univ. Northern BC, Prince George, BC. 98 p.
62. Sherry, E.E. and H.M. Myers. 2002. Traditional environmental knowledge in practice. Soc. & Nat. Res. 15: 345-358.
63. Singleton, S. 1998. Constructing co-operation: The evolution of institutions of co-management. U. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. 165 p.
64. Sunderlin, W.D. and M.L.G. Gorospe. 1997. Fishers' organizations and modes of co-management: The case of San Miguel Bay, Philippines. Human Organization 56(3): 333-343.
65. Taylor, P.L. 2000. Producing more with less? Community forestry in Durango, Mexico in an era of trade liberalisation. Rural Sociol. 65(2): 253-274.
66. Thompson, H. 1999. Social forestry: An analysis of Indonesian forestry policy. J. Contemp. Asia 29(2): 187-201.
67. Treseder, L. and N. Krogman. 1999. Features of First Nation forest management institutions and implications for sustainability. For. Chron. 75(5): 793-798.
68. Usher, P.J. 1986. The devolution of wildlife management and the prospects for wildlife conservation in the Northwest Territories. Policy Paper No. 3. Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, Ottawa. 139 p.
69. Vira, B. 1997. Deconstructing participatory forest management: Towards a tenable typology. Oxford Centre for the Environment, Ethics and Society, Oxford.
70. Vitug, M.D. 1997. The politics of community forestry in the Philippines. J. Env & Dev. 6(3): 334-340.
71. White, S.A. (ed.) 1999. The art of facilitating participation: Releasing the power of grassroots communication. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
72. White, S.A. and K.S. Nair. 1999. The catalyst communicator: Facilitation without fear. In S.A. White (ed.). The art of facilitating participation: Releasing the power of grassroots communication. pp. 35-51. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
73. Wily, L. 1999. Moving forward in African community forestry: Trading power, not use rights. Soc. & Nat. Res. 12: 49-61.
74. Witty, D. 1994. Co-management as a community development tool: The practice behind the theory. Plan Can. (Jan): 22-27.