Argument based machine learning applied to law

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-73

  Možina, Martin ^a   Žabkar, Jure ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^b   Bratko, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; CN2; Legal information systems; Legal knowledge discovery; Machine learning; Rule induction

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ARGUMENTATION; CN2; LEGAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LEGAL KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; RULE INDUCTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746896235     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: 15728382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-006-9002-4     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Aleven, V. (1997). Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
2. Bench-Capon, T. (1991). Knowledge Based Systems and Legal Applications, Chapt. Knowledge Based Systems Applied To Law: A Framework for Discussion, 329-342. Academic Press.
3. Bench-Capon, T. (1993). Neural Nets and Open Texture. In Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, 292-297. ACM Press: Amsterdam.
4. Bench-Capon, T. and Coenen, F. (2000). An Experiment in Discovering Association Rules in the Legal Domain. In 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 1056-1060. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos.
5. Borges, F., Borges, P. and Bourcier, D. (2002). A Connectionist Model to Justify the Reasoning of a Judge. In Proceedings of Jurix, 113-122. IOS Press.
6. Bratko, I. and Možina, M. (2004). Argumentation and Machine Learning. In Deliverable 2.1 for the ASPIC project.
7. Brüninghaus, S. and Ashley, K. D. (1999). Toward Adding Knowledge to Learning Algorithms for Indexing Legal Cases. In ICAIL '99: Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9-17. ACM Press: New York, NY, USA.
8. Cestnik, B. (1990). Estimating Probabilities: A Crucial Task in Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 147-149.
9. Clark, P. and Boswell, R. (1991). Rule Induction with CN2: Some Recent Improvements. In Machine Learning - Proceeding of the Fifth Europen Conference (EWSL-91), 51-163. Berlin.
10. Clark, P. and Niblett, T. (1989). The CN2 Induction Algorithm, 4(3): 261-283.
11. DeJong, G. and Mooney, R. (1986). Explanation-based Learning: And Alterative View, 1, 145-176.
12. Edvards, L. (1995). Modelling Law using a Feminist Theoretical Perspective, 4, 95-110.
13. Groothius, M. and Svensson, J. (2000). Expert System Support and Juridical Quality. In Jurix, 1-10. IOS Press: Amsterdam.
14. Johnston, B. and Govenatori, G. (2003). Induction of Defeasible Logic Theories in the Legal Domain. In Ninth International Conference on AI and Law, 204-213. ACM Press: Edinburgh.
15. Mitchell, T., Keller, R. and Kedar-Cabelli, D. (1986). Explanation-based Generalization: A Unifying View, 1, 47-80.
16. Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. (1997). Knowledge Discovery in the Split Up Project. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, 89-97. ACM Press: New York.