Data visualization during the early stages of drug discovery

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1806-1818

  Maniyar, Dharmesh M ^a   Nabney, Ian T ^a   Williams, Bruce S ^b   Sewing, Andreas ^b  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b PFIZER GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DATA REDUCTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS;

DATA VISUALIZATION; DRUG DISCOVERY; GENERATIVE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING (GTM); VISUALIZATION ALGORITHMS;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG DESIGN;

DRUG DESIGN; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 33746893423     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050471a     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Fox, S.; Farr-Jones, S.; Yund, M. A. High-throughput screening for drug discovery: Continually transitioning into new technologies. J. Biomol. Screening 1999, 4, 183-186.
2. Handon, J. S. High-throughput screening - challenges for the future. Drug Discovery World 2002, Summer, 47-50.
3. Englebienne, P. High throughput screening: Will the past meet the future? Front. Drug Des. Discovery 2005, 1, 69-86.
4. Bajorath, J. Rational drug discovery revisited: Interfacing experimental programs with bio- and chemo-informatics. Drug Discovery Today 2001, 6, 989-995.
5. Bredel, M.; Jacoby, E. Chemogenomics: An emerging strategy for rapid target and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 262-275.
6. Downs, G. M.; Barnard, J. M. Clustering methods and their uses in computational chemistry. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2002, 18, 1-40.
7. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Metric validation and the receptor relevant subspace concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
8. Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual screening and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
9. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
10. Oprea, T. I.; Zamora, I.; Ungell, A. L. Pharmacokinetically based mapping device for chemical space navigation. J. Comb. Chem. 2002, 4, 258-266.
11. Clark, E.; Pickett, S. D. Computational methods for the prediction of 'drug-likeness'. Drug Discovery Today 2000, 5, 49-58.
12. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
13. Butina, D.; Segall, M. D.; Frankcombe, K. Predicting ADME properties in silico: Methods and models. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, S83-S88.
14. Manallack, D. T.; Pitt, W. R.; Gancia, E.; Montana, J. G.; Ford, M. G.; Livingstone, D. J.; Whitley, D. C. Selecting screening candidates for kinase and g protein-coupled receptor targets using neural networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1256-1262.
15. Schneider, G.; Nettekoven, M. Ligand-based combinatorial design of selective purinergic receptor (a2a) antagonists using self-organizing maps. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 233-237.
16. Wenlock, M. C.; Austin, R. P.; Barton, P.; Davis, A. M.; Leeson, P. D. A comparison of physicochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1250-1256.
17. Manallack, D. T.; Tehan, B. G.; Gancia, E.; Hudson, B. D.; Ford, M. G.; Livingstone, D. J.; Whitley, D. C.; Pitt, W. R. A consensus neural network-based technique for discriminating soluble and poorly soluble compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 647-679.
18. Godden, J. W.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Recursive median partitioning for virtual screening of large databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 182-188.
19. Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Classification of biologically active compounds by median partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1263-1269.
20. Bajorath, J. Virtual screening in drug discovery: Methods, expectations and reality. Curr. Drug Discovery 2002, March, 24-28.
21. Bishop, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995.
22. Sammon, J. W. A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1969, C-18, 401-409.
23. Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995.
24. Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Partitioning methods for the identification of active molecule. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 707-715.
25. Balakin, K. V.; Ivanenkov, Y. A.; Savchuk, N. P.; Ivashchenko, A. A.; Ekins, S. Comprehensive computational assessment of ADME properties using mapping techniques. Curr. Drug Discovery Technol. 2005, 2 (2), 99-113.
26. von Korff, M.; Steger, M. GPCR-tailored pharmacophore pattern recognition of small molecular ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (3), 1137-1147.
27. Givehchi, A.; Dietrich, A.; Wrede, P.; Schneider, G. Chemspace-shuttle: A tool for data mining in drug discovery by classification, projection, and 3d visualization. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22 (5), 549-559.
28. Lowe, D.; Tipping, M. E. Neuroscale: Novel topographic feature extraction with radial basis function networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. 1997, 9, 543-549.
29. Bishop, C. M.; Svensén, M.; Williams, C. K. I. GTM: The generative topographic mapping. Neural Comput. 1998, 10, 215-234.
30. Bishop, C. M.; Svensén, M.; Williams, C. K. I. Magnification factors for the GTM algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE Fifth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, July 7-9, 1997; pp 64-69.
31. Bishop, C. M.; Svenśn, M.; Williams, C. K. I. Magnification factors for the som and gtm algorithms. Workshop Proc. Self-Organizing Maps 1997, 333-338.
32. Tiňo, P.; Nabney, I. T.; Sun, Y. Using directional curvatures to visualize folding patterns of the GTM projection manifolds. Artificial Neural Networks - ICANN; Dorffner, G., Bischof, H., Hornik, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 2001; pp 421-428.
33. Tiňo, P.; Nabney, I. T.; Sun, Y.; Williams, B. S. A principled approach to interactive hierarchical non-linear visualization of high-dimensional data. Comput. Sci. Stat. 2001, 33, 580-587.
34. SciTegic. http://www.scitegic.com/ (accessed Oct 2005).
35. Spotfire. http://www.spotfire.com/ (accessed Oct 2005).
36. Tipping, M. E.; Lowe, D. Shadow targets: A novel algorithm for topographic projections by radial basis functions. Neurocomputing 1998, 19, 211-222.
37. Tiňo, P.; Nabney, I. T. Constructing localized non-linear projection manifolds in a principled way: Hierarchical generative topographic mapping. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24, 639-656.
38. Aurenhammer, F. Vornoi diagrams - survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Comput. Surveys 1991, 3, 345-405.
39. Inselberg, A.; Dimsdale, B. Parallel coordinates: A tool for visualizing multi-dimensional geometry. Proc. IEEE Visualization 1990, 361-375.
40. Levy, S. Interactive 3-d visualization of particle systems with partiview. Proc. Int. Astronom. Union Symp. 2001, 208, 85-91.
41. MathWorks. http://www.mathworks.com/ (accessed Oct 2005).
42. Nabney, I. T. Netlab: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition, 1st ed.; Springer: London, 2001.
43. Cover, T.; Thomas, J. Elements of Information Theory, 1st ed.; Wiley: New York, 1991.
44. Maniyar, D. M.; Nabney, I. T. Guiding local regression using visualisation. In Deterministic and Statistical Methods in Machine Learning, LNAI; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2005; pp 98-109.
45. Diller, D. J.; Hobbs, D. W. Deriving knowledge through data mining high-throughput screening data. J. Med. Chem 2004, 47, 6373-6383.
46. Gribbon, P.; Sewing, A. High-throughput drug discovery: What can we expect from HTS? Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10 (1), 17-22.