The management of new primary care organizations: An international perspective

Health Services Management Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 166-173

  Meads, Geoffrey D ^a   Wild, Andrea ^a   Griffiths, Frances ^a   Iwami, Michiyo ^a   Moore, Phillipa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEADERSHIP; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANNING; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; INTERVIEWS; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 33746868947     PISSN: 09514848     EISSN: 09514848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/095148406777888125     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Department of Health. The New NHS - Modern, Dependable. London: The Stationery Office, 1997
2. Department of Health. A Responsive and High Quality Local NHS. London: Department of Health Publications, 2004
3. Ashcroft J. Releasing the dividend of "new" partnerships. In: Meads G, Meads P, eds. Trust in Experience. Transferable Learning for Primary Care Trusts. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2001:49-68
4. Meads G, Ashcroft J. Relationships in the NHS. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2000
5. Schluter M, Lee D. The 'R' Factor. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2003
6. Wild A, Iwami M, Meads G. Different systems, same issues. Primary Care Rep 2003;6:14-19
7. Twigg JL. Health care reform in Russia: a survey of head doctors and insurance administrators. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:2253-65
8. Marjoribanks T, Lewis JM. Reform and autonomy: perceptions of the Australian general practice community. Soc Sci Med 2002;56:2229-39
9. Reimer-Hommel P. The changing nature of contracts in German health care. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1447-55
10. Johns D. Health and development in South africa: from principles to practice. Development 2001;44:122-8
11. Naylor CD. Health care in Canada: incrementalism under fiscal duress. Health Affairs 1999;18:9-26
12. Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement: The New Arrangements 2003. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/ OrganisationPublic/PatientAndPublicInvolvement/ InvolvingPatientsPublicHealthcare/fs/en (accessed 17 June 2004)
13. Cortez R. Equity and Health Service Quality: The CLAS Case. Lima: Pacifico University, 1998
14. Iwami M, Petchey R. A CLAS act? Community-based organisations, health service decentralization and primary care development in Peru. J Publ Health Med 2002;24:246-51
15. Diaz RR. CLAS: Una experiencia para decentralizar servicios de salud. Gestion Med 2001;226:18-19
16. Wheeler D. The Stakeholder Corporation. London: Pitman, 1997
17. Goicoechea J. Primary Health Care Reforms. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 1996
18. Widdus R. Public-private partnership for health: their main targets, their diversity and their future directions. WHO Bull 2001;79:713-20
19. Meads G. Up the Greek: mixed funding, mixed blessings. Primary Care Rep 2003;5:20-5
20. Collins C, Aravjo J, Barbosa J. Decentralising the health sector: issues in Brazil. Health Policy 2000;52:113-27
21. Kipp W, Kamugisha J, Jacobs P, Burnhamm G, Ruballe T. User fees, health staff incentives and service utilisation in Kabarole District, Uganda. WHO Bull 2001;79:1032-7
22. Meads G, Killoran A, Ashcroft J, Cornish Y. Mixing Oil and Water. London: Health Education Authority, 1999