A model for predicting invasive weed and grass dynamics. II. Accuracy evaluation

Weed Science

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 605-614

  Rinella, Matthew J ^a   Sheley, Roger L ^b  

^a US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition model; Meta analysis; Population dynamics; Validation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; GRASS; HERBICIDE; INVASIVE SPECIES; MODEL VALIDATION; PLANT COMMUNITY; WEED CONTROL;

EUPHORBIA ESULA;

EID: 33746868060     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-191R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aguiar, M. R., W. K. Lauenroth, and D. P. Peters. 2001. Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. J. Ecol. 89:40-47.
2. Chow, P.N.P. 1984. Control of leafy spurge in pastures using dicamba and 2,4-D. J. Range Manage. 37:159-162.
3. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
4. Cousens, R. 1995. Can we determine the intrinsic dynamics of real plant populations? Funct. Ecol. 9:15-20.
5. Cousens, R. and A. M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
6. Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7. Eriksson, O. 1989. Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 55:231-238.
8. Ferrell, M. A., T. D. Whitson, and H. P. Alley. 1989. Control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) with growth regulator-herbicide combinations. Weed Technol. 3:479-484.
9. Firbank, L. G. and A. R. Watkinson. 1986. Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effects upon crop yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:147-159.
10. Freckleton, R. P. and A. R. Watkinson. 1998. Predicting the determinants of weed abundance: a model for the population dynamics of Chenopodium album in sugar beet. J. Appl. Ecol. 35:904-920.
11. Gaudet, C. L. and P. A. Keddy. 1988. Predicting competitive ability from plant traits: a comparative approach. Nature 334:242-243.
12. Goldberg, D. E. 1987. Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology 68:1211-1223.
13. Grime, J. P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. 2nd ed. West Sussex, Great Britain: J. Wiley.
14. Gylling, S. R. and W. E. Arnold. 1985. Efficacy and economics of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control in pasture. Weed Sci. 33:381-385.
15. Hein, D. G. 1988. Single and Repetitive Picloram Treatments on Leafy Spurge and Resulting Changes in Shoot Density, Canopy Cover, Forage Production and Utilization by Cattle. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
16. Hjorth, J.S.U. 1994. Computer Intensive Statistical Methods. London: Chapman & Hall.
17. Keddy, P. 2001. Competition. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
18. Kropff, M. J. 1988. Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production. Weed Res. 28:465-471.
19. Lym, R. G. 2000. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with glyphosate plus 2,4-D. J. Range Manage. 53:68-72.
20. Lym, R. G. and C. G. Messersmith. 1994. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control, forage production, and economic return with fall-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 8:824-829.
21. Lym, R. G. and C. G. Messersmith. 1985. Leafy spurge control and improved forage production with herbicides. J. Range Manage. 5:386-391.
22. Lym, R. G. and D. A. Tober. 1997. Competitive grasses for leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) reduction. Weed Technol. 11:782-792.
23. Markle, D. M. and R. G. Lym. 2001. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control and herbage production with Imazapic. Weed Technol. 15:474-480.
24. Maxwell, B. D. 1984. Changes in an Infested Plant Community after an Application of Picloram, the Effect of Glyphosate on Bud Dormancy, the Effect of Pulling and the Fuel Potential of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). M.S. thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
25. Mitchell, R. J., B. R. Zutter, D. H. Gjerstad, G. R. Glover, and C. W. Wood. 1999. Competition among secondary-successional pine communities. A field study of effects and responses. Ecology 80:857-872.
26. Newman, E. I. 1973. Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 244:310-311.
27. Pacala, S. W. 1997. Dynamics of plant communities. Pages 532-555 in M. J. Crawley, ed. Plant Ecology. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
28. Parker, I. M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecol. Appl. 10:726-743.
29. Peltzer, D. A. and M. Kochy. 2001. Competitive effects of grasses and woody plants in mixed-grass prairie. J. Ecol. 89:519-527.
30. Ricker, W. 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11:559-623.
31. Rinella, M. J. and R. L. Sheley. 2005a. A model for predicting invasive weed and grass dynamics: I. Model development. Weed Sci. 53:586-593.
32. Rinella, M. J. and R. L. Sheley. 2005b. Influence of soil water availability on competition among leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and grasses. West. North Am. Nat. 65:233-241.
33. Shea, K. and D. Kelly. 2004. Modeling for management of invasive species: musk thistle (Carduus nutans) in New Zealand. Weed Technol. 18:1338-1341.
34. Sheley, R. L. and J. K. Petroff. 1999. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
35. Vore, R. E. 1984. Effect of Herbicide Treatments on Leafy Spurge Shoot and Root Control, Forage Production and Herbicide Residue. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
36. Watkinson, A. R. 1981. Interference in pure and mixed populations of Agrostemma githago L. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:967-976.
37. Werner, P. A. and H. Caswell. 1977. Population growth rates and age versus stage-distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecology 58:1103-1111.
38. Wilson, S. D. and D. Tilman. 1991. Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology 72:1050-1065.