Feasibility of a pressure wire and single arterial puncture for assessing aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 359-362

  Bae, Jang Ho ^a   Lerman, Amir ^b   Yang, Eric ^b   Rihal, Charanjit ^b,c  

^a Konyang University   (South Korea)

^b MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA PRESSURE; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE; ARTERY PUNCTURE; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CALIBRATION; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CALIBRATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; PRESSURE; PUNCTURES;

EID: 33746859736     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 1951;41:1-29.
2. Krueger SK, Orme EC, King CS, Barry WH. Accurate determination of the transaortic valve gradient using simultaneous left ventricular and femoral artery pressures. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:202-206.
3. Laskey WK, Kusiak V, Untereker WJ, Hirshfeld JW Jr. Transseptal left heart catheterization: Utility of a sheath technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1982;8:535-542.
4. Jayne JE, Catherwood E, Niles NW, Friedman BJ. Double-lumen catheter assessment of aortic stenosis: Comparison with separate catheter technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;29:157-160.
5. Carabello BA, Barry WH, Grossman W. Changes in arterial pressure during left heart pullback in patients with aortic stenosis: A sign of severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1979;44:424-427.
6. Fusman B, Faxon D, Feldman T. Hemodynamic rounds: Transvalvular pressure gradient measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:553-561.
7. Horstkotte D, Jehle J, Loogen F. Death due to transprosthetic catheterization of a Bjork-Shiley prosthesis in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:566-567.
8. Parham W, El Shafei A, Rajjoub H, et al. Retrograde left ventricular hemodynamic assessment across bileaflet prosthetic aortic valves: The use of a high-fidelity pressure sensor angioplasty guidewire. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:509-513.
9. Nath A, Vetrovec GW, Mukharji J, et al. Simultaneous left ventricular and ascending aortic pressure measurements via single artery access for assessment of aortic stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;17:126-130.
10. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic input impedance in normal man: Relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980;62:105-116.
11. Bertog SC, Smith A, Panetta CJ. Feasibility assessment of aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis using a pressure wire through a 4 French system and single femoral arterial access. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:E24-E26.