Simulation of dynamic ductile crack growth using strain-rate and triaxiality-dependent cohesive elements

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 73, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 2210-2228

  Anvari, M ^a   Scheider, I ^b   Thaulow, C ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cohesive zone modeling; Dynamic loading; Rate dependency; Rate dependent Gurson type model; Stress triaxiality

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRAIN RATE;

COHESIVE ZONE MODELING; RATE DEPENDENCY; RATE-DEPENDENT GURSON TYPE MODEL; STRESS TRIAXIALITY;

CRACK PROPAGATION;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRACK PROPAGATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRAIN RATE;

EID: 33746853863     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Nishioka T. Computational dynamic fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 86 (1997) 127-159
2. Siegmund T., and Brocks W. A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Engng Fract Mech 67 (2000) 139-154
3. Tvergaard V., and Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32 (1984) 157-169
4. Zhang Z.L., Thaulow C., and Ødegård J. A complete Gurson model approach for ductile fracture. Engng Fract Mech 67 (2000) 155-168
5. Thomason P.F. Ductile fracture of metals (1990), Pergamon Press, Oxford
6. Dugdale D.S. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8 (1960) 100-104
7. Barenblatt G.I. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7 (1962) 55-129
8. Hillerborg A., Modéer M., and Petersson P.E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6 (1976) 773-782
9. Petersson PE. Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials. Technical report, Report LUTVDG/TVBM-1006, Lund Institute of Technology. 1981.
10. Needleman A. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54 (1987) 525-531
11. Tvergaard V. Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Adv Appl Mech 27 (1990) 83-151
12. Siegmund T., and Brocks W. Predictions of the work of separation and implications to modeling. Int J Fract 99 (1999) 97-116
13. Tvergaard V., and Hutchinson J.W. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40 (1992) 1377-1397
14. Brocks W., Sun D.Z., and Hönig A. Verification of the transferability of micromechanical parameters by cell model calculations for visco-plastic materials. Int J Plast 11 (1995) 971-989
15. Broberg K.B. The cell model of materials. Comput Mech 19 (1997) 447-452
16. Tvergaard V. Crack growth predictions by cohesive zone model for ductile fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 49 (2001) 2191-2207
17. Costanzo F., and Walton J.R. Numerical simulations of a dynamically propagating crack with a nonlinear cohesive zone. Int J Fract 91 (1998) 373-389
18. Corigliano A., and Ricci M. Rate-dependent interface models: formulation and numerical applications. Int J Solids Struct 38 (2001) 547-576
19. Zhang X., Mai Y.W., and Jeffrey R.G. A cohesive plastic and damage zone model for dynamic crack growth in rate-dependent materials. Int J Solids Struct 40 (2003) 5819-5837
20. Broberg K.B. Influence of T-stress, cohesive strength and yield strength on the competition between decohesion and plastic flow in a crack edge vicinity. Int J Fract 100 (1999) 133-142
21. Wnuk M.P., and Legat J. Work of fracture and cohesive stress distribution resulting from triaxiality dependent cohesive zone model. Int J Fract 114 (2002) 29-46
22. Tvergaard V., and Hutchinson J.W. Effect of strain-dependent cohesive zone model on predictions of crack growth resistance. Int J Solids Struct 33 20-22 (1996) 3297-3308
23. ABAQUS. ABAQUS version 6.4. H.K.S. Inc. Pawtucket, USA. 2003.
24. Zhang ZL. A practical micro-mechanical model-based local approach methodology for the analysis of ductile fracture of welded T-joints. PhD thesis. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland. 1994.
25. Scheider I. Cohesive model for crack propagation analyses of structures with elastic-plastic material behavior. Foundations and implementation. Technical report, GKSS internal report no. WMS/2000/19. 2000.
26. Clausen AH, Auested T. Split-Hopkinson tension bar, experimental set-up and theoretical considerations. Technical report, SIMLab internal report no. R-16-02. 2002.
27. Pan J., Saje M., and Needleman A. Localization of deformation in rate sensitive porous plastic solids. Int J Fract 21 (1983) 261-278
28. Gurson J. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth. Part I-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Engng Mater Technol 99 (1977) 2-15
29. Tvergaard V. On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18 (1982) 237-252
30. Koplik J., and Needleman A. Void growth and coalescence in porous plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 24 (1988) 835-853
31. Needleman A., and Tvergaard V. An analysis of dynamic, ductile crack growth in a double edge cracked specimen. Int J Fract 49 (1991) 41-67
32. Sun D.Z., Hönig A., Böhme W., and Schmitt W. Application of micromechanical models to the analysis of ductile fracture under dynamic loading. In: Erdogan F., and Hartranft R.J. (Eds). Fracture mechanics: 25th syp. ASTM STP vol. 1220 (1994), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia 343-357
33. Curran D.R., Seaman L., and Shockey D.A. Dynamic failure of solids. Phys Rep 147 (1987) 253-388
34. Johnson J.W. Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids. J Appl Phys 52 4 (1981) 2812-2825
35. Liu J. A new dynamic void growth model. Doctoral thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway. 2004.
36. Bernauer G., and Brocks W. Micro-mechanical modelling of ductile damage and tearing - results of a european numerical round robin. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 25 (2002) 384-463
37. Needleman A. An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int J Fract 42 (1990) 21-40
38. Guinea G.V., Planas J., and Elices M. A general bilinear fit for the softening curve of the concrete. Mater Struct 27 (1994) 99-105
39. Scheider I., and Brocks W. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1943-1961
40. Siegmund T., and Needleman A. A numerical study of dynamic crack growth in elastic-viscoplastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 34 (1997) 769-787
41. Lin G., Cornec A., and Schwalbe K.H. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of crack extension in aluminum alloy 2024-FC. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 21 (1998) 1159-1173
42. Scheider I., and Brocks W. The effect of the traction separation law on the results of cohesive zone crack propagation analyses. Key Engng Mater 251-252 (2003) 313-318
43. Falk M., Needleman A., and Rice J.R. A critical evaluation of cohesive zone models of dynamic fracture. J Phys IV France 11 (2001) 43-50
44. Négre P., Steglich D., and Brocks W. Crack extension in aluminium welds: a numerical approach using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model. Engng Fract Mech 71 71 (2004) 2365-2383
45. Freund L.B. Dynamic fracture mechanics (1998), Cambridge University Press
46. Basu S., and Narashimhan R. Finite element simulation of mode I dynamic ductile fracture initiation. Int J Solids Struct 33 8 (1996) 1191-1207
47. Basu S., and Narashimhan R. A numerical investigation of loss of crack tip constraint in a dynamically loaded ductile specimen. J Mech Phys Solids 48 (2000) 1967-1985
48. Needleman A. Numerical modeling of crack growth under dynamic loading conditions. Comput Mech 19 (1997) 463-469