Comparison of academic achievement between montessori and traditional education programs

Journal of Research in Childhood Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 5-13

  Lopata, Christopher ^a   Wallace, Nancy V ^b   Finn, Kristin V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b CANISIUS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746847219     PISSN: 02568543     EISSN: 21502641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02568540509594546     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baines, M., & Snortum, J. (1973). A timesampling analysis of Montessori versus traditional classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 313-316.
2. Chattin-McNichols, J. (1992). Montessori programs in public schools. ERIC Digest, EDO-PS-7.
3. Crain, W. (1992). Theories of development: Concepts and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Daux, T. (1995). Report on academic achievement in a private Montessori school. The NAMTA Journal, 20(2), 145-147.
5. Dawson, M. (1987). Minority student performance: Is the Montessori magnet school effective? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED309881)
6. Glenn, C. M. (1996). The longitudinal assessment study: Cycle 4 (ten year) follow-up. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No ED 403013)
7. Haines, A M (1995) Montessori and assessment: Some issues of assessment and curriculum reform. The NAMTA Journal, 20(2), 116-130
8. Harris, I, & Callender, A (1995) Comparative study of peace education approaches and their effectiveness The NAMTA Journal, 20(2), 133-144
9. Kendall, S. D. (1993). The development of autonomy in children: An examination of the Montessori educational model The NAMTA Journal, 18, 64-83.
10. M McGraw-Hill. (2002). TerraNova, 2nd ed: Technical Bulletin 1 Monterey, CA: Author
11. Miller, L. B., & Bizzell, R. P. (1984). Long-term effects of four preschool programs: Ninth- and tenth-grade results. Child Development, 55, 1570-1587
12. New York State Education Department (2004a). State assessment: Elementary and intermediate mathematics Retrieved April 15, 2004, from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/elint-math.html
13. New York State Education Department (2004b). State assessment: Elementary and intermediate English language arts. Retrieved April 15, 2004, from www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/elintela.html
14. North American Montessori Teachers’ Association. (2003). Introduction to Montessori education. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from www.montessori-namta.org/NAMTA/geninfo/whatismont.html
15. Pickering, J S (1992) Successful applications of Montessori methods with children at risk for learning disabilities Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 90-109.
16. Ryniker, D. H., & Shoho, A. R. (2001). Student perceptions of their elementary classrooms: Montessori vs traditional environments Montessori Life, Winter, 45-48
17. Seldin, T. (2002/03). What research says about Montessori’s effectiveness. Tomorrow’s Child, Winter, 5-11