A note on publication and citation rates of female academics in earthquake engineering

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1063-1075

  Trifunac, Mihailo D ^a  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; PUBLISHING; TEACHING;

CITATION RATES; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PUBLICATION RATES;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FEMALE EDUCATION;

EID: 33746837259     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Trifunac M.D. On publication rates in earthquake engineering. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25 6 (2005) 413-420
2. Trifunac MD. On citation rates in earthquake engineering. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 2005, this issue, doi:10.1016/j.solidyn.2006.05.010.
3. Trifunac MD. Scientific citations of M.A. Biot. In: Abousleiman YN, Cheng AH, Ulm FJ, editors. Proceedings of the Biot centenial conference, Norman, Oklahoma, Poromechanics III, 2005. p. 11-7.
4. Bozeman B, Lee S. The impact of research collaboration of scientific productivity. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Advancement of Science, Denver, CO, February 2003.
5. Hagstrom W.O. The scientific community (1965), Basic Books, New York
6. La Follette M.C. Stealing into print (1992), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
7. Hamilton DP. Research papers: who's uncited now? Science 1991; January:25.
8. Hamilton DP. Publishing by-and for? The numbers. Science 1991;December:1331.
9. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. A study on the relative ranking of twelve faculty of the USC civil engineering department: experiments with the science citation index expanded. Department of Civil Engineering, Report No. CE 04-01. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California; 2004.
10. Wanner R.A., Lewis L.S., and Gregorio D.I. Research productivity in academia: a comparative study of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Sociol Edu 54 (1981) 238-253
11. Cole J.R., and Cole S. The Ortega hypothesis. Science 178 (1972) 368
12. Rudd E. The effect of alphabetic order of author listing on the careers of scientists. Soc Stud Sci 7 (1977) 268-269
13. Lindsey D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problems of multiple authorship. Soc Stud Sci 10 (1980) 145-162
14. Lehman H.C. Age and achievement (1953), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
15. In: Pelz D., and Andrews F.M. (Eds). Scientists in organizations: productive climate for research and development (1976), Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI
16. Bayer A.E., and Dutton E. Career age and research professional activities of academic scientists. J High Educ 48 (1977) 259-282
17. Hammel E. Report of the task force on faculty renewal. Population research (1980), University of California, Berkeley
18. Cole R., and Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle. In: Maehr M.L., and Steinkamp M.W. (Eds). Advances in motivation and achievement (1984), JAI Press 217-258
19. Fox M.F. Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Soc Stud Sci 13 (1983) 285-305
20. Long J.S. Problems and prospects for research on sex differences in scientific careers. In: Dix L.S. (Ed). Women: their under-representation and career differentials in science and engineering (1987), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 157-169
21. Wenneras C., and Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature 387 (1997) 341-343
22. Clemente F. Early career determinants of research productivity. Am J Soc 79 (1973) 409-419
23. Xie Y., and Shauman K.A. Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. Am Sociol Rev 63 (1998) 847-870
24. Amin A, Mabe B. Impact factors, use and abuse. Perspect Publishing, No. 1, 2000. p. 1-6.
25. Frank M. Impact factors: arbiter of excellence?. J Med Lib Assoc 91 1 (2003) 4-6
26. Garfield E. The meaning of the impact factor. Int J Clin Health Psychol 3 2 (2003) 263-269
27. Long J.S. Measure of sex differences in scientific productivity. Soc Forces 71 1 (1992) 159-178