Evaluation of the Expressiveness of an ICNP-based Nursing Data Dictionary in a Computerized Nursing Record System

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 456-464

  Cho, InSook ^a   Park, Hyeoun Ae ^b  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE; KOREA; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL ORDER; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSICIAN; STANDARD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 33746829180     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1982     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Griffith H., and Robinson K. Survey of the degree to which critical care nurses are performing current procedural terminology-coded services. Am J Crit Care 1 2 (1992) 91-98
2. Griffith H., and Robinson K. Current procedural terminology (CPT) coded services provided by nurse specialists. Image J Nurs Scholarsh 25 3 (1993) 178-186
3. Zielstorff R.D., Cimino C., Barnett G.O., Hassan L., and Blewett D.R. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus. a pilot study. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care (1992) 392-396
4. Henry S.B., Holzemer W.L., Reilly C.A., and Campbell K.E. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems. can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1 1 (1994) 61-74
5. Ozbolt J.G., Fruchtnicht J.N., and Hayden J.R. Toward data standards for clinical nursing information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1 2 (1994) 175-185
6. Parlocha P. Defining a critical path for psychiatric home care patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (1995), University of California Press, San Francisco, CA
7. Lange L.L. Representation of everyday clinical nursing language in UMLS and SNOMED. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. (1996) 140-144
8. Holzemer W., Henry S., Dawson C., Sousa K., Bain C., and Hsieh S. An evaluation of the utility of the home health care classification for categorizing patient problems and nursing interventions from the hospital setting. Nursing informatics: the impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics proceedings of NI'97, Sixth Triennial International Congress of IMIA-NI, Nursing Informatics of International Medical Informatics Association. 46 ed. (1997), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 21-26
9. Henry S., Holzemer W., Randell C., Hsieh S., and Miller T. Comparison of Nursing Interventions Classification and Current Procedural Terminology codes for categorizing nursing activities. Image J Nurs Scholarsh 29 2 (1997) 133-138
10. Henry S., and Mead C. Nursing classification systems. necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 4 3 (1997) 222-232
11. Hardiker N., and Kirby J. A compositional approach to nursing terminology. Nursing informatics: the impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics proceedings of NI'97, Sixth Triennial International Congress of IMIA-NI, Nursing Informatics of International Medical Informatics Association. 46 ed. (1997), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3-7
12. Redes S., and Lunney M. Validation by school nurses of the Nursing Intervention Classification for computer software. Comput Nurs 15 6 (1997) 333-338
13. Henry S., Warren J., Lange L., and Button P. A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. focus on implementation of nursing vocabularies in systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 4 (1998) 321-328
14. Button P., Androwich I., Hibben L., Kern V., Madden G., Marek K., et al. Challenges and issues related to implementation of nursing vocabularies in computer-based systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 4 (1998) 332-334
15. Uys E., and Geyer N. ICNP. the International Classification for Nursing Practice. Nurs Update (S Afr) 23 7 (1999) 20-21
16. Wake M., and Coenen A. The International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP): toward the beta version. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the thirteenth conference, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association Celebrating the 25th anniversary of NANDA (1999), Cinahl Information Systems, Glendale, CA 405-409
17. Nurses ICo. ICNP Update (1999), International Council of Nurses, Geneva, Switzerland
18. Warren J., and Coenen A. International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). most-frequently asked questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 4 (1998) 335-336
19. Cho I., and Park H.-A. Development and evaluation of a terminology-based electronic nursing record system. J Biomed Inform 36 4-5 (2003) 304-312
20. Liaskos J., and Mantas J. Evaluating an ICNP Web-based Nursing Documentation System. Medinfo 2004 (2004) 386-390
21. Florin J., Ehrenberg A., and Ehnfors M. Standardized care planning. evaluation of ICNP beta in the areas of nutrition and skin care in a practice setting. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 14 4 (2003) 42
22. Myung H., and Park H. Analysis of nursing record for ICNP based electronic nursing record system. J Korean Soc Med Inform 8 S(1 (2002) s144-s147
23. Suh D., Cho I., and Park H. e-Health for all: designing nursing agenda for the future, NI 2003: proceedings, 8th International Congress in Nursing Informatics, Rio de Janeiro, June 20-25, 2003. Content analysis of maternity nursing records for development of electronic nursing record system using ICNP (2003), E-papers Serviços Editoriais, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
24. Cimino J., Patel V., and Kushniruk A. Studying the human-computer-terminology interface. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8 2 (2001) 163-173
25. Bakken S. Standards for Electronic Health Records and Clinical Decision Support Systems (2000), Springer Publishing Company, Inc, New York
26. ICN-International Council of Nurses. ICNP version 1. International classification for nursing practice (2005) Geneva