Energetic life cycle assessment of fuel cell powertrain systems and alternative fuels in Germany

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2726-2739

  Wagner, U ^a   Eckl, R ^a   Tzscheutschler, P ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746817058     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. T. Dreier, and P. Tzscheutschler Life cycle assessment of innovative powertrain systems and alternative fuels VDI-Trans 1565 2000 555 569 [in German].
2. T. Dreier Cumulative system analysis and potentials of biofuels 2000 E&M Energie und Management Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Herrsching, Germany [in German].
3. Angloher J, Dreier T. Technologies and systems for the supply of hydrogen -perspectives of a hydrogen economy, report no. 1, Hydrogen Initiative Bavaria (WIBA), Munich, Germany, 2000 [in German].
4. T. Dreier Biofuels - energetic, environmental and economic analysis 1999 E&M Energie und Management Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Herrsching, Germany [in German].
5. Wagner U. PE fuel cell systems and conventional power systems - a comparison of primary energy consumption. In: Büchi FN, Scherer GG, Wokaun A, editors. Proceedings first European PEFC Forum, Lucerne, Switzerland. Oberrohrdorf, Switzerland: European Fuel Cell Forum; 2001. p. 539-46.
6. German Association of Engineers - Society for Energy Technology (VDI-GET). Cumulative energy demand - terms, definitions, methods of calculation. VDI guideline no. 4600, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 1997.
7. U. Wagner, B. Geiger, and H. Schäfer Energy life cycle analysis of hydrogen systems Int J Hydrogen Energy 23 1 1998 1 6.
8. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division 2000 energy statistics yearbook 2002 United Nations Publication New York.
9. J. Carvalho Neto, N. Deimezis, M. Lecloux, P. Karadelogou, and R.A. Bailey Energy in Europe - annual energy review 1991 Commission of the European Communities Brussels, Belgium.
10. U. Wagner Heat production from chemically and physically bound energy 1997 E&M Energie und Management Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Herrsching, Germany [in German].
11. Forschungsvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschine e.V. (FVV). Fuel cell study final report, project no. 686, FVV e.V., Frankfurt, Germany, 1998 [in German].
12. S. Kim, and B. Dale Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain: I. System expansion Int J Life Cycle Assess 7 4 2002 237 243.
13. ISO Environmental management - life cycle assessment - Goal and scope definition and life cycle inventory analysis. ISO 14041 1998 International Organisation for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland.
14. Frischknecht R. Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making; scope-dependent system models and context-specific joint product allocation, dissertation no. 12599, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 1998.
15. U. Wagner, J. Angloher, and T. Fleißner Life cycle assessment of hybrid vehicles VDI-Trans 1378 1998 129 139 [in German].
16. Dreier T, Fleißner T. Life cycle assessment of car bodies made of steel, aluminium and glass fibre reinforced plastics. Internal report, Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology, Munich, Germany, 1998 [in German].
17. T. Fleißner Comparative life cycle assessment of different drive concepts VDI-Trans 1307 1996 137 155 [in German].
18. T. Fleißner Primary energy optimisation of a hybrid vehicle 1999 E&M Energie und Management Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Herrsching, Germany [in German].
19. Bauer H, et al. Cumulative energy demand and energy optimisation of passenger cars. Internal report, Research Institute for Energy Economy (FfE), Munich, Germany, 1998 [in German].
20. Institute for Machine Elements - Gear Research Centre. Research project SFB 365 "Autark Hybrid", Munich University of Technology, Munich, Germany, 1999 (see also: http://www.fzg.mw.tu-muenchen.de/sfb365/sfb.html).
21. Rehmeier H. System modelling of fuel cell vehicles. Diploma thesis. Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology, Munich University of Technology, Munich, Germany, 2000 [in German].
22. M. Åhman Primary energy efficiency of alternative powertrains in vehicles Energy 26 11 2001 973 989.
23. M. Pehnt Life-cycle assessment of fuel cell stacks Int J Hydrogen Energy 26 1 2001 91 101.
24. Hellwig M. Well to wheel process chain analysis of a liquid hydrogen fuel cell vehicle. Diploma thesis. Daimler Chrysler AG, Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology, Kirchheim/Teck-Nabern, Munich, Germany, 1999 [in German].
25. Nolte R. Fuel cell vehicles at GM/Opel. J Power Sources 2005, in press.
26. M. Wang Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts J Power Sources 112 1 2002 307 321.
27. Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology Database for the simulation of energetic process chains (SEP) 2002 Munich University of Technology Munich, Germany.
28. Öko-Institut Global emission model for integrated systems (GEMIS) 2002 Öko-Institut e.V., Institute for Applied Ecology Freiburg, Germany (see also: http://www.oeko.de/service/gemis/en/index.htm).
29. Büchi FN, Ruge M. Development of a bipolar element for PE-fuel cells demonstration in a 6 kW stack, PSI Scientific Report 2000(5), Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, 2001.
30. Büchi FN, Ruge M, Dietrich P, Geiger F, Hottinger P, Marmy CA, et al. Development of a 40 kW fuel cell system based on an array of 6 polymer electrolyte fuel cell stacks, PSI Scientific Report 2001(5), Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, 2002.
31. K.S. Jeong, and B.S. Oh Fuel economy and life-cycle cost analysis of a fuel cell hybrid vehicle J Power Sources 105 2002 58 65.
32. Arthur DL. Cost analysis of fuel cell system for transportation - baseline system cost estimate, task 1 and 2 final report, Arthur D. Little, Cambridge, MA, 2000 (see also: http://www.ott.doe.gov/pdfs/baseline_cost_model.pdf).
33. Kraft J. Personal communication. Proton Motor Fuel Cell GmbH, Starnberg, Germany, 2003.
34. M. Pehnt Assessing future energy and transport systems: the case of fuel cells. Part 1: methodological aspects Int J Life Cycle Assess 8 5 2003 283 289.
35. M. Pehnt Assessing future energy and transport systems: the case of fuel cells. Part 2: environmental performance Int J Life Cycle Assess 8 6 2003 365 378.
36. C. Koroneos, A. Dompros, G. Roumbas, and N. Moussiopoulos Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes Int J Hydrogen Energy 29 2004 1443 1450.
37. L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH GM well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a European study 2002 L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH Ottobrunn, Germany (see also: http://www.lbst.de/gm-wtw).
38. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratory, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - North American analysis, Argonne National Laboratory Transportation Technology R&D Center, Argonne, IL, 2001 (see also: http://www.transportation.anl.gov).
39. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Schafer A, Natarajan VK. Comparative assessment of fuel cell cars, report no. LFEE 2003-001 RP, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Cambridge, MA, 2003 (see also: http://lfee.mit.edu/public/LFEE_2003-001_RP.pdf).
40. S.S. Penner Steps towards the hydrogen economy Energy 31 1 2006 33 43.