Watered Down: Partial Implementation of the New Generation Jail Philosophy

The Prison Journal

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 284-300

  Tartaro, Christine ^a  

^a RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

jail; new generation; podular direct supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746810914     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885506290851     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bayens, G. J., Williams, J. J., & Smykla, J. O. (1997a). Jail type and inmate behavior: A longitudinal analysis. Federal Probation, 61 (3), 54-62.
2. Bayens, G. J., Williams, J. J., & Smykla, J. O. (1997b). Jail type makes difference: Evaluating the transition from a traditional to a podular, direct supervision jail across ten years. American Jails, 11 (2), 32-39.
3. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979).
4. Bowker, L. H. (1980). Prison victimization. New York: Elsevier.
5. del Carmen, R. V., Ritter, S. E., & Witt, B. A. (1998). Briefs in leading cases in corrections (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
6. Farbstein, J. (1986). Correctional facility planning and design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7. Farbstein, J., & Wener, R. (1989). A comparison of “direct” and “indirect” supervision correctional facilities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
8. Gettinger, S. H. (1984). New generation jails: An innovative approach to an age-old problem. Longmont, CO: NIC Jails Division.
9. Harding, B. G., Linke, L., Van Court, M., White, J., & Clem, C. (2001). 2001 directory of direct supervision jails. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
10. Houston, J. G., Gibbons, D. C., & Jones, J. F. (1988). Physical environment and jail social climate. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 449-466.
11. Jeffrey, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Kerle, K. (1995). Direct supervision: The need for evaluation. American Jails, 9 (3), 5-5.
13. Levinson, R. B. (1999). Unit management in prisons and jails. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
14. Nelson, W. R. (1983, April). New generation jails. Corrections Today, pp. 108-112.
15. Nelson, W. R. (1988). The origins of the podular direct supervision concept: An eyewitness account. American Jail, 2 (1), 8-16.
16. Nelson, W. R., & Davis, R. M. (1995). Podular direct supervision: The first twenty years. American Jails, 9 (3), 11-22.
17. Resser, J. P. (1989). The design of safe and humane police cells. Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody.
18. Rothman, D. J. (2002). The discovery of the asylum. New York: Adine de Gruyter. (Original work published 1971)
19. Senese, J. D., Wilson, J., Evans, A. O., Aguirre, R., & Kalinich, D. B. (1992). Evaluating jail reform: Inmate infractions and disciplinary response in a traditional and a podular/direct supervision jail. American Jails, 6 (4), 14-23.
20. Smith, S. M., & Aamodt, M. G. (1997). The relationship between education, experience and police performance. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 12 (2), 7-14.
21. Sykes, G. (1972). Society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Tartaro, C. (2002). Examining implementation issues with new generation jails. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 219-237.
23. Tartaro, C. (2003). Suicide and the jail environment: An evaluation of three types of institutions. Environment and Behavior, 35, 605-620.
24. Truxillo, D. M., Bennett, S. R., & Collins, M. L. (1998). College education and police job performance: A ten-year study. Public Personnel Management, 27, 269-272.
25. U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). State and local law enforcement statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26. Welch, M. (1996). Corrections: A critical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Wener, R. (2005). The invention of direct supervision. Corrections Compendium, 30 (2), 4-7, 32-34.
28. Wener, R., Frazier, F. W., & Farbstein, J. (1993). Direct supervision of correctional institutions. In National Institute of Corrections (ed.), Podular, direct supervision jails (pp. 1-8). Longmont, CO: NIC Jails Division.
29. Wener, R., Frazier, W., & Farbstein, J. (1985). Three generations of evaluation and design of correctional facilities. Environment and Behavior, 17 (1), 71-95.
30. Williams, J. L., Rodeheaver, D. G., & Huggins, D. W. (1999). A comparative evaluation of a new generation jail. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 223-246.
31. Zupan, L. L. (1991). Jails: Reform and the new generation philosophy. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
32. Zupan, L. L., & Menke, B. A. (1988). Implementing organizational change: from traditional to new generation jail operations. Policy Studies Review, 7, 615-625.
33. Zupan, L. L., & Menke, B. A. (1991). The new generation jail: An overview. In J. A. Thompson & G. L. Mays (eds.), American jails (pp. 180-194). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
34. Zupan, L. L., & Stohr-Gilmore, M. K. (1988). Doing time in the new generation jail: Inmate perceptions of gains and losses. Policy Studies Review, 7, 626-640.