Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices

Pediatrics

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Kemper, Alex R ^a,b   Uren, Rebecca L ^a   Clark, Sarah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude to computers; Computerized; Medical records systems; Pediatrics; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMMUNIZATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PEDIATRICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PEDIATRICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746800826     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 02105721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3000     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:1-10
2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Health IT (HIT) adoption initiative. Available at: www.hhs.gov/ healthit/measuring.html. Accessed January 6, 2006
3. Hersh W. Health care information technology: progress and barriers. JAMA. 2004;292:2273-2274
4. Middleton B, Hammond WE, Brennan PF, Cooper GF. Accelerating US EHR adoption: how to get there from here - recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:13-19
5. Johnson KB. Barriers that impede the adoption of pediatric information technology. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155: 1374-1379
6. Institute of Medicine; Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer DE, eds. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997
7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Task Force on Medical Informatics. Special requirements for electronic medical record systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2001;108:513-515
8. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Clinical Information Technology. EMR review project. Available at: www. aapcocit.org/emr. Accessed January 6, 2006
9. Burt CW, Hing E. Use of Computerized Clinical Support Systems in Medical Settings: United States 2001-03. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2005
10. Audet AM, Doty M, Peugh J, Shamasdin J, Zapert K, Schoenbaum S. Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? MedGenMed. 2004;6:2
11. Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1323-1333
12. Council of American Survey Research Organizations. On the definition of response rates: a special report of the CASRO Task Force on Completion Rates. Available at: www.casro.org/ resprates.cfm. Accessed January 6, 2006
13. Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I, Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1127-1137
14. Anand V, Biondich PG, Liu G, Rosenman M, Downs SM. Child health Improvement Through Computer Automation: the CHICA system. Medinfo. 2004;11:187-191
15. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Directory of federal HIT programs. Available at: www.hhs.gov/ healthit/federalprojectlist.html. Accessed January 6, 2006