Dynamic software architecture oriented approach to online evolution

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1360-1371

  Yu, Ping ^a   Ma, Xiao Xing ^a   Lu, Jian ^a   Tao, Xian Ping ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Consistency; Dynamic software architecture; Integrity; Online evolution; Reflection; Traceability

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; COMPONENTS; REFLECTION; SPECIFICATIONS;

ARCHITECTURE META MODEL; COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT; CONSISTENCY; DYNAMIC SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; INTEGRITY; ONLINE EVOLUTION; TRACEABILITY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33746789854     PISSN: 10009825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/jos171360     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Garlan D. Software architecture: A roadmap. In: Finkelstein A, ed. Proc. of the Future of Software Engineering. New York: ACM Press, 2000. 91-101
2. Magee J, Kramer J. Dynamic structures in software architectures. Software Engineering Notes, 1996,21(6):3-14.
3. Medvidovic N, Rosenblum DS, Taylor RN. A language and environment for architecture-based software development and evolution. In: Proc. of the 1999 Int'l Conf. of Software Engineering. Los Angeles: ACM, 1999. 44-53.
4. Wang QX, Huang G, Shen JR, Mei H, Yang FQ. Runtime software architecture based online evolution. In: Alexander R. ed. Proc. of the COMPSAC 2003. Dallas: IEEE Computer Society, 2003. 230-235.
5. Shaw M, Garlan D. Software Architecture: Perspective on an Emerging Discipline. New York: Prentice Hall, 1996.
6. Medvidovic N, Taylor RN. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 2000,26(1):70-93.
7. Garlan D, Schmerl B. Using architectural models at runtime: research challenges. In: Oquendo F, Warboys B, Morrison R, eds. Proc. of the 1st European Workshop on Software Architectures. LNCS 3047, St. Andrews: Springer-Verlag, 2004. 200-205.
8. Oreizy P, Gorlick MM, Taylor RN, et al. An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intelligent System, 1999,14(3):54-62.
9. Allan R, Douence R, Garlan D. Specifying and analyzing dynamic software architectures. In: Astesiano E, ed. Proc. of the Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS 1382, Lisbon: Springer-Verlag, 1998. 21-37.
10. Aldrich J, Chambers C, Notkin D. ArchJava: Connecting software architecture to implementation. In: Proc. of the ICSE 2002. Orlando: ACM, 2002. 187-197.
11. Maes P. Concepts and experiments in computational reflection. In: Meyrowitz NK, ed. Proc. of the OOPSLA'87. Orlando: ACM, 1987. 147-155.
12. Garlan D, Monroe RT, Wile D. ACME: An architecture description interchange language. In: Johnson JH, ed. Proc. of the CASCON'97. 1997. 169-183. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/-able/publications/acme-cascon97/
13. Ma XX, Zhang XL, Lu J. Description and implementation of dynamic software architectures: A reflective approach. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 2004,40(2):146-155 (in Chinese with English abstract).
14. Ma XX, Yu P, Tao XP, Lu J. A service-oriented dynamic coordination architecture and its supporting system. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2005,4(28):467-477 (in Chinese with English abstract).
15. Tanenbaum AS, Steen M. Distributed Systems Principles and Paradigms. New York: Prentice Hall, 2002.
16. Yu P, Ma XX, Lu J. Dynamic software architecture oriented service composition and evolution. In: Gu N, Wei DM, Xie ZP, eds. Proc. of the CIT 2005. Shanghai: IEEE Computer Society, 2005. 1123-1129.
17. Baresi L, Heckel R, Thone S, Varro D. Modeling and validation of service-oriented architectures: Application vs. style. In: Proc. of the ESEC/FSE 2003. Helsinki: ACM, 2003. 68-77.
18. Kuske S, Gogolla M, Kollmann R, Kreowski HJ. An integrated semantics for UML class, object and state diagrams based on graph transformation. In: Butler MJ, Petre L, Sere K, eds. Proc. of the 3rd Int'l Conf. on Integrated Formal Methods. LNCS 2335, Turku: Spinger-Verlag, 2002. 11-28.
19. Cazzola W, Chiba S, Saake G. Software evolution: A trip through reflective, aspect, meta-data oriented techniques. In: Malenfant J, østvold BM, eds. Proc. of the ECOOP 2004 Workshop Reader. LNCS 3344, Oslo: Springer-Verlag, 2005. 118-132.
20. Huang G, Mei H, Yang FQ. Runtime software architecture based on reflective middleware. Science in China (Series E), 2004,34(2):121-138 (in Chinese with English abstract).
21. Falcarin P, Alonso G. Software architecture evolution through dynamic AOP. In: Oquendo F, Warboys B, Morrison R, eds. Proc. of the 1st European Workshop on Software Architectures. LNCS 3047, St. Andrews: Springer-Verlag, 2004. 57-73.