Strategic behaviour under european antidumping duties

International Journal of the Economics of Business

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 75-99

  Pauwels, Wilfried ^a   Vandenbussche, Hylke ^b   Weverbergh, Marcel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antidumping Duties; Domestic Welfare; Two PERIOD Cournot Oligopoly

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746786995     PISSN: 13571516     EISSN: 14661829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13571510151075297     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, S.P., Schmitt, N., and Thisse, J., 1995. "Who Benefits from Antidumping Legislation?". Journal ofInternational Economics, 38: 321–37.
2. Belderbos, R., 1997. "Antidumping and Tariff Jumping: Japanese Firms' DFI in the European Union and theUnited States," ”. University of Sussex. Working paper
3. Bellis, J., 1990. "The EEC Antidumping System," ”. In Antidumping Law andPractice, Edited by: Jackson, J., and Vermulst, E., 510Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
4. Brander, J., and Spencer, B., 1985. "Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,". Journal ofInternational Economics, 18: 83–100.
5. Collie, D., 1997. "Antidumping Regulations: Anticompetitive and Anti-export,". Mimeo, Cardiff BusinessSchool, 33
6. 1994. Commission of EC, EC regulation 3283/94. Official Journal, L 349: 1–21.
7. Commission of EC, "Annual Reports on the Community's Antidumping and Antisubsidy Activities,"1983- 93.
8. Eaton, J., and Grossman, G., 1986. "Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly,". Quarterly Journalof Economics,: 383–406.
9. Fischer, R., 1992. "Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm Behaviour,". Journal of InternationalEconomics, 32: 149–63.
10. GATT. 1991. Trade Policy Review, the European Communities Vol. 2, Geneva
11. Hindley, B., 1988. "Dumping and the Far East Trade of the EC,". World Economy,: 445–63.
12. Horlick, G., 1990. "The US Antidumping System," ”. In Antidumping Law andPractice, Edited by: Jackson, J., and Vermulst, E., 510Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13. Jackson, J., and Vermulst, E., 1990. Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study. Hemel Hempstead:Harvester Wheatsheaf,: 520
14. Kaplan, S., 1991. "Injury and Causation in US ITC Antidumping Determinations," ”. In Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures, Edited by: Tharakan, P.K.M., 292Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Leidy, M., 1993. "Quid Pro Quo Restraint and Spurious Injury: Subsidies and the Prospect of CVDs," ”. In Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, Edited by: Deardorff, A., and Stern, R., AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Messerlin, P., 1989. "The EC Antidumping Regulation: A First Economic Appraisal,". WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, 125(3): 563–87.
17. Messerlin, P., and Reed, G., 1995. "The US and EC Antidumping Policies,". The Economic Journal, 105(433): 1565–75.
18. Osborne, M.J., and Rubinstein, A., 1994. A Course in Game Theory, 352Cambridge: The MIT Press.
19. Pauwels, W., and Springael, L., 2000. "The Welfare Effects of an Anti-Dumping Duty and of a Price-Undertaking in the Context of the European Anti-Dumping Policy," ”. Ufsia: University ofAntwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics. Mimeo
20. Prusa, T., 1994. "Pricing Behaviour in the Presence of Antidumping Law,". Journal of Economic Integration, 9(2): 260–89.
21. Reitzes, J., 1993. "Antidumping Policy,". International Economic Review, 34(4): 745–63.
22. Roberts, J., and Sonnenschein, H., 1976. "On the Existence of Cournot Equilibrium without Concave ProfitFunctions,". Journal of Economic Theory, 13: 112–17.
23. Singh, N., and Vives, X., 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly,". Rand Journalof Economics, 15(4): 546–54.
24. Staiger, R., and Wolak, F., 1989. "Strategic Use of Antidumping Law to Enforce Tacit Collusion," ”. NBERworking paper, No. 3016
25. Staiger, R., and Wolak, F., 1990. "The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of ForeignMonopoly," ”. NBER working paper, No. 3254
26. Tharakan, P.K.M., and Waelbroeck, J., 1994. "Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Decisions in the EC andthe US: An Experiment in Comparative Political Economy,". European Economic Review, 38(1): 171–93.
27. Vandenbussche, H., 1996. "Is European Antidumping Protection against Central Europe too High ?". Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132(1): 116–38.
28. Vermulst, E., and Waer, P., 1991. "The Calculation of Injury Margins in EC Antidumping Proceedings,". Journal of World Trade,: 5–42.