Prevalence of intraocular hypertension and glaucoma in a nonselected French population;Prévalence de l'hypertonie oculaire et du glaucome dans une population française non sélectionnée

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 635-641

  Bron, A ^a   Baudouin, C ^b   Nordmann, J P ^b   Rouland, J F ^c   Thomas, F ^d   Bean, K ^d   De Clercq, B ^d   Benetos A ^d   De Gendre, A Solesse ^e   Lefebvre, S ^e  

^a HÔPITAL DU BOCAGE   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Centre IPC   (France)

^e PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Glaucoma; Logistic regression; Ocular hypertension; Prevalence; Screening; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRANCE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE; PREVALENCE; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 33746786352     PISSN: 01815512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0181-5512(06)73824-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet, 2004;363:1711-20.
2. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol, 1996;80:389-93.
3. World health problem of glaucoma. F Grehn. J Glaucoma, 2001; 10(Supl1):S2-S4.
4. Rouland JF, Berdeaux G, Lafuma A. The economic burden of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: implications for patient management: a review. Drugs Aging, 2005;22:315-21.
5. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, et al. Relation between IOP and POAG among white and black americans. Arch Ophthalmol, 1991;109:1090-5.
6. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intra-ocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol, 1998;126:487-97.
7. Delcourt C, Carriere I, Ponton-Sanchez A, Lacroux A, Covacho MJ, Papoz L. Light exposure and the risk of cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular cataracts: the Pathologies Oculaires Liees a l'Age (POLA) study. Arch Ophthalmol, 2000;118:385-92.
8. Comité de lutte contre le glaucome. Étude descriptive de l'hypertonie oculaire - Rapport de synthèse Paris 1983.
9. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa N, Bernardi P, De Franco I, Perfetti S, Varotto A, Tenna V. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology, 1998;105:209-15.
10. Anton A, Andrada MT, Mujica V, Calle MA, Portela J, Mayo A. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a Spanish population: the Segovia study. J Glaucoma, 2004;13:371-6.
11. Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, Hayashi T, Nawa T, Miyamoto T, et al. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol, 2002;134:529-37.
12. Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, Smulyan H, Richard JL, Ducimetière P, Guize L. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population, Hypertension, 1997;30:1410-5.
13. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005;89:847-50.
14. Hashemi H, Kashi AH, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. Distribution of intraocular pressure in healthy Iranian individuals: the Tehran Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005;89:652-7.
15. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian WX, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol, 1993;77:17-21.
16. Nakano T, Tatemichi M, Miura Y, Sugita M, Kitahara K. Long-term physiologic changes of intraocular pressure: a 10-year longitudinal analysis in young and middle-aged Japanese men. Ophthalmology, 2005;112:609-16.
17. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol, 1966;50:570-86.
18. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology, 1994;101:1851-5.
19. Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, et al. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol, 1980;24:335-610.
20. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Javitt JC, Sommer A. Diabetes, intraocular pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology, 1995;102:48-53.
21. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 1992;99:1499-504.
22. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol, 2004;122:532-8.
23. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 1996;103:1661-9.
24. Weih LM, Nanjan M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology, 2001;108:1966-72.
25. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002;120:701-13.
26. Quigley HA. Glaucoma: macrocosm to microcosm the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:2662-70.
27. Bron A, Chapard J, Creuzot-Garcher C, Guerzider V, d'Athis P. La mesure de l'épaisseur cornéenne est-elle fiable et utile ? J Fr Ophtalmol, 1999;22:160-8.
28. Parkin B, Shuttleworth G, Costen M, Davison C. A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera. Br J Ophthalmol, 2001;85:1347-51.
29. Nicolela MT, Drance SM, Broadway DC, Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP. Agreement among clinicians in the recognition of patterns of optic disk damage in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001;132:836-44.
30. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology, 2004;111:1641-8.
31. Kroese M, Burton H, Vardy S, Rimmer T, McCarter D. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in general ophthalmic practice in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol, 2002;86:978-80.
32. Johannesson G, Gudmundsdottir GJ, Linden C. Can the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma be estimated from a retrospective clinical material? A study on the west coast of Iceland. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2005;83:549-53.
33. Quigley HA. Current and future approaches to glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma 1998;7:210-20.
34. Wilson MR. Screening paradigms in glaucoma. J Glaucoma, 2001;10:S25-7.