Farm friends: Exploring intergenerational environmental learning

Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 107-116

  Peterat, Linda ^a   Mayer Smith, Jolie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Environmental learning; Farming; Intergenerational

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746785569     PISSN: 15350770     EISSN: 15350932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J194v04n01_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Abrams, J., & Giles, H. (1999). Intergenerational contact as intergroup communication. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.) Intergenerational programs, understanding what we have created (pp. 203-217). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
2. Cajete, G. (1999). Reclaiming biophilia, lessons from indigenous peoples. In G. Smith & D. R. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action, on weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 189-206). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
3. Caldicott, J. B. (1998). The aesthetic value of nature. In S. J. Armstrong & S. Botzler (Eds.), Environmental ethics: Convergence and divergence (pp. 152-154). Toronto: McGraw-IIill.
4. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Sanders, D., Tearney, K., & Benefield, P. (2003). Improving the understanding of food, farming and land management amongst school-age children: A literature review (Research Brief No. 422). http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/accessed March 7, 2004.
5. Gelter, H. (2000). Friluftsliv: The Scandinavian philosophy of outdoor life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 77-92.
6. Granville, G., & Ellis, S. (1999). Developing theory into practice: Researching intergenerational exchange. Education and Ageing, 14(3), 231-248.
7. Jardine, D. (2000). "Under the tough old stars," ecopedagogical essays. Brandon, VT: The Foundation for Educational Renewal.
8. Kaplan, M. S. (2002). Intergenerational programs in schools: Considerations of form and function. International Review of Education, 49(5), 305-334.
9. Kuehne, V. S. (1998/99). Building intergenerational communities through research and evaluation. Generations, 22(4), 82-88.
10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. McNamee, A. S. (1997). Ecological caring: A psychological perspective on the person environment relationship. In P. J. Thompson (Ed.), Environmental education for the 21st century (pp. 259-267). New York: Peter Lang.
12. Morris, M. (2002). Ecological consciousness and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(5), 571-587.
13. Neugarten, B., & Weinstein, K. (1964). Found in Noller et al. 2001.
14. Nouer, P., Feency, J. A., & Peterson, C. (2001). Personal relationships across the life-span. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
15. Pajaczkowska, C. (2001). Issues in feminist visual culture. In F. Carson & C. Pajaczkowska (Eds.), Feminist visual culture (pp. 2-21). New York: Routledge.
16. Riley-Taylor, E. (2002). Ecology, spirituality, and education, curriculum for relational knowing. New York: Peter Lang.
17. Smith, B. J., & Yeager, A. (1999). Intergenerational communities: Where learning and interaction go hand-in-hand. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs, understanding what we have created (pp. 25-32). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
18. Waddock, S., & Freedman, M. (1998/99). Reducing the generation gap and strengthening schools. Generations, 22(4).
19. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.