Semi-automatic 3D reconstruction of urban areas using epipolar geometry and template matching

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 466-485

  Dias, José Miguel Sales ^a,b   Bastos, Rafael ^b   Correia, João ^b   Vicente, Rodrigo ^b  

^a MICROSOFT   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; EPIPOLAR GEOMETRY; SEMI-AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION; TEMPLATE MATCHING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION; URBAN AREAS;

URBAN PLANNING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; URBAN PLANNING;

AIRBORNE SENSING; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; IMAGING METHOD; RECONSTRUCTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 33746722010     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00452.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Abdel-Aziz, Y. I. & Karara, H. M. (1971), Direct linear transformation into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry, in Proceedings of the Symposium Close-Range Photogrammetry, January, pp. 1-18.
2. Arbouche, S. (1999), Feature point correspondence: A matching constraints survey, M.C.S thesis, University of Ottawa.
3. Baker, T. J. (1989), Automatic mesh generation for complex three-dimensional regions using a constrained Delaunay triangulation, Engineering with Computers, Springer-Verlag, No. 5, pp. 161-75.
4. Bernardes, P., Laurentina, S., Sérgio, C., Rodrigues, R., Diogo, A. & Teixeira, J. (1996), Virtual reality, urban planning and historical town centers, Computer Graphik Topics, Vol. 8, No. 4/96.
5. Bastos, R. & Dias, J. M. S. (2004), Fully automated texture tracking based on natural features extraction and template matching, in ISMAR 04 Demo, 3rd IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Arlington, VA, USA, Nov. 2-5.
6. Brakke, K. A. (2004), Surface Evolver Manual, Mathematics Department, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870, 2.24 edition.
7. Debevec, P. E., Borshukov, G. & Yu, Y. (1998), Efficient View-Dependent Image-Based Rendering with Projective Texture-Mapping, in 9th Eurographics Rendering Workshop, Vienna, Austria.
8. Dennis, T. & Papadimitiou, D. (1996), Epipolar line estimation and rectification for stereo image pairs, in IEEE, Transactions on Image Processing, 5(4), 672-76.
9. Dias, J. M. S. (2004), 3D interaction via the internet in the virtual Angra do Heroísmo model, JOIN'04, 19-21 April (in Portuguese). Retrieved from: http://www.urban-virtual.com, November 1, 2005.
10. Dias, P. (2003), Three dimensional reconstruction of real world scenes using laser and intensity data, PhD thesis, Universidade de Aveiro.
11. Faugeras, O., Deriche, R. & Zhang, Z. (1994), Robust recovery of the epipolar geometry for an uncalibrated stereo rig, in Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 1, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 567-76.
12. Fischler, M. A. & Bolles, R. C. (1981), Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography, Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381-95.
13. Golub, G. H. & Van Loan, C. F. (1996), Matrix Computations, 2nd edn, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
14. Google Earth, A 3D interface to the planet. Retrieved from: http://earth.google.com, November 1, 2005.
15. Heath, M., Sarkar, S., Sanocki, T. & Bowyer, K. W. (1997), A robust visual method for assessing the relative performance of edge-detection algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(12), 1338-59.
16. Kasser, M. & Ebels, Y. (2002), Digital Photogrammetry, Taylor and Francis, New York, pp. 212-17.
17. Laganiére, R. (2002), A Comparative Study of Some Matching Strategies, University of Ottawa Press.
18. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1981), A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections, Nature, 293, 133-35.
19. Lowe, D. G. (2004), Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, International Journal of Computer Vision, 60 (2), 91-110.
20. Nakagawa, M., Shibasaki, R. & Kagawa, Y. (2002), Fusing Stereo Linear CCD Image and Laser Range Data for Building 3D Urban Model, ISPRS Commisssion IV, WG IV/7.
21. OpenCV, Intel Open Computer Vision Library, Retrieved from: http://www.intel.com/research/mrl/research/opencv/, November 1, 2005.
22. Owen, C. B., Xiao, F. & Middlin, P. (2002), What is the best fiducial?in The 1st IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany.
23. Pollefeys, M. (2001), Obtaining 3D Models With a Hand-held Camera, Lecture Notes SIGGRAPH Course.
24. SEDRIS, The source for environmental representation and interchange. Retrieved from: http://www.sedris.org/, November 1, 2005
25. Trucco, E. & Veri, A. (1998), Introductory Techniques for 3D Computer Vision, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
26. VRML, Retrieved from: http://www.web3d.org/x3d/specifi-cations/vrml/ISO_IEC_14772-All/, November 1, 2005.
27. Zhang, Z. (1999), Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations, in International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'99), Corfu, Greece, pp. 666-73.
28. 3D URBAN, Sistema de Gestão e Visualização 3D de Planos e Projectos URBANos - Projecto POSI 2010 (in Portuguese). Retrieved from: http://www.3d-urban.com, November 1, 2005.