Sustainable forestry in the balance

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 187-195

  Shifley, Stephen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumption; Growth; Harvest; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HARVESTING; MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WOOD PRODUCTS;

CONSUMPTION IMPACTS; FOREST RESOURCES; HARVESTING IMPACTS;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; HARVESTING; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

CONSUMPTION; FORESTRY; GROWTH; HARVESTING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WOOD PRODUCTS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746712196     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams, D.M. 2003. Market and resource impacts of a Canadian lumber tariff. J. For. 101(2):48-52.
2. Bosworth, D. 2003. Sustainable forest management: Moving forward together. Speech at 12th World Forestry Congress, Quebec, Canada, Sept. 24, 2003. Available online at www.fs.fed.us/news/2003/speeches/09/ quebec.shtml; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
3. Bowyer J. 2005. Alternatives to forest harvest and wood use. Available online at www.dsisd.k12.mi.us/mff/Products/Bowyer.htm; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
4. Carpenter, C.A., C. Giffen, and M. Miller-Weeks. 2003. Sustainability assessment highlights for the northern United States. USDA For. Serv. Northeastern Area State and Private For. Rep. NA-TP-05-03, Newtown Square, PA. 99 p.
5. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2000. Global forest resources assessment 2000. FAo Forestry Pap. 140, The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available online at www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/DOCREP/004/Y1997E/ y1997eln.htm; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2001. State of the World's forests, 2001. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. www.snvworld.org/ cds/reSFB/forest/1.1.1./State% 20of%20world%27%20forests/y0900300.htm; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
7. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2005. The world's forests, 2000. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Available online at www.fao.org/ DOCREP/004/Y1997E/y1997e31. jpg10; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
8. Gardner-Outlaw, T., and R. Engelman. 1999. Forest futures: Population, consumption, and wood resources. Population Action International, Washington, DC. 68 p.
9. Haynes, R.W. (Tech. Coord.). 2003. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States 1952-2050. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-560, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. Available online at www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
10. Howard, J.L. 2003. U.S. timber production, trade consumption, and price statistics 1965 to 2002. USDA For. Serv. For. Prod. Lab. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-615, Madison, WI. 90 p.
11. Lippke, B., J. Wilson, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Bowyer, and J. Meil. 2004. CORRIM: Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. For. Prod. J. 54(6):8-19.
12. Miles, P.D. 2005. Forest inventory mapmaker web-application version 1.7. USDA For. Serv., North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. Available online at www.ncrs2.fs.fed.us/4801/fiadb/index.htm; last accessed May 19, 2005.
13. Montréal Process Working Group. 2005. The Montréal process. Available online at www.mpci.org/home_e.html; last accessed Feb. 18, 2005.
14. Natural Resources Canada. 2005. Area classification by province/ territory, 2001. Available online at www.nfi.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/canfi/data/ area-large_e.html; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
15. Shifley, S.R., and N.H. Sullivan. 2002. The status of timber resources in the North Central United States. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-228, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. 47 p.
16. Smith, W.B., P.D. Miles, J.S. Vissage, and S.A. Pugh. 2003. Forest resources of the United States, 2002. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. 137 p.
17. Society of American Foresters, 2004. NAFTA rules United States not harmed by Canadian softwood. Forestry Source 9(10):1.
18. Strigel, M., and C. Meine. 2001. Report of the intelligent consumption project. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, Madison, WI. www.wisconsinacademy.org/programs/icp/report.html; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
19. United Nations Environmental Programme. 2005. Global environmental outlook 3. United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. www.unep.org/www.unep.org/GEO/geo3/english/images/fig110bs.jpg; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006.
20. US Census Bureau. 2005a. Total midyear population for the world: 1950-2050. www.census.gov/ipc/www/worldpop.html; last accessed Feb. 18, 2005.
21. US Census Bureau. 2005b. U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/; last accessed Feb. 18, 2005.
22. USDA Forest Service. 2004. National report on sustainable forests - 2003. USDA For. Serv. Washington Office, Rep. FS-766, Washington, DC. Available online at www.216.48.37.142/pubs/viewpub.jsp?index=6951; last accessed Feb. 13, 2006,
23. Zhu, Z., amd D. Evans. 1994. U.S. forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 60:525-531.