Erratum to "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies" [J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 920-925] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007);ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 920-925

  Van Breukelen, Gerard J P ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ANCOVA; Change from baseline; Nonrandomized studies; Regression to different means; Regression to the mean; Repeated measures

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746708040     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (21)

1. Campbell D.T., and Kenny D.A. A primer on regression artifacts (1999), Guilford Press, New York
2. Holland P.W., and Rubin D.B. On Lord's paradox. In: Wainer H., and Messick S. (Eds). Principals of modern psychological measurement (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 3-25
3. Kenny D.A. A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychol Bull 82 (1975) 345-362
4. Lord F.M. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychol Bull 68 (1967) 304-305
5. Lord F.M. Statistical adjustments when comparing pre-existing groups. Psychol Bull 72 (1969) 336-337
6. Maris E. Covariance adjustment versus gain scores revisited. Psychol Methods 3 (1998) 309-327
7. Porter A.C., and Raudenbush S.W. Analysis of covariance: its model and use in psychological research. J Counseling Psychol 34 (1987) 383-392
8. Rosenbaum P.R., and Rubin D.B. Estimating the effects caused by treatments. J Am Stat Assoc 79 (1984) 26-28
9. Rubin D.B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Ed Psychol 66 (1974) 688-701
10. Rubin D.B. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J Ed Stat 2 (1977) 1-26
11. Weisberg H.I. Statistical adjustments and uncontrolled studies. Psychol Bull 86 (1979) 1149-1164
12. Ruiter M. Preventie van depressie bij jongeren (Prevention of depression among adolescents). Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands; 1997.
13. Maxwell S.E., and Delaney H.D. Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective (1990), Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA
14. Kleinbaum D.G., Kupper L.L., Muller K.E., and Nizam A. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. (1998), Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA
15. Laird N.M., and Wang F. Estimating rates of change in randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 11 (1990) 405-419
16. Stigler S.M. Regression towards the mean, historically considered. Stati Methods Med Res 6 (1997) 103-114
17. Schafer J.L., and Graham J.W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7 (2002) 147-177
18. Carroll R.J. Covariance analysis in general linear measurement error models. Stat Med 8 (1989) 1075-1093
19. Senn S.J. Covariance analysis in generalized linear measurement error models. Stat Med 9 (1990) 583-586
20. Rosenbaum P.R. The role of a second control group in an observational study. Stat Sci 2 (1987) 292-316
21. Rosenbaum P.R. The role of known effects in observational studies. Biometrics 45 (1987) 557-569