In reply [4]

Pediatrics

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 514-515

  Kopelman, Loretta M ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD ABUSE; CIVIL RIGHTS; COMA; COURT; FETUS DEATH; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PAIN; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGULATORY MECHANISM;

EID: 33746702013     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 00314005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1077     Document Type: Letter

References (20)

1. Kopelman LM. Are the 21-year-old Baby Doe rules misunderstood or mistaken [commentary]? Pediatrics. 2005;115:797-802
2. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants - HHS. Final rules. Fed Regist. 1985;50:14879-14892
3. US Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Pub L No. 42 USC 5101 et seq
4. Montalvo v Borkovec, WI App 147; 256 Wis. 2d 472; 647 N.W. 2d 413 (2002)
5. Bowen v American Hospital Association, 106 S Ct 2101 (1986)
6. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 1995;96:362-364
7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics. 1994;93:532-536
8. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants - HHS. Final rules. Fed Regist. 1984;49:1622-1654
9. US Rehabilitation Act, Pub L No. 93-112, 29 USC 794
10. Kopelman LM, Kopelman AE, Irons TG. Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:677-683
11. Reagan R. Abortion and the conscience of the nation. In: Butler JD, Walbert, DF, eds. Abortion, Medicine and the Law. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Facts on File; 1986:352-358
12. Koop CE. The challenge of definition. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989;19(1 suppl);2-3
13. Murray TH. The final anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe. Hastings Cent Rep. 1985;15:5-9
14. Robertson JA. Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34(4):32-39
15. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Ethics in the care of critically ill infants and children. Pediatrics. 1996;98:149-153
16. Kopelman LM. Rejecting the Baby Doe regulations and defending the "negative" analysis of the best-interests standard for infants. J Med Philos. 2005; In press
17. Steinhauser K, Christakis N, Clipp E, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky J. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476-2482
18. Singer P, Martin D, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients' perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281(2):163-168
19. National Hospice Organization. Standards of a Hospice Program of Care. Arlington, Virginia: National Hospice Organization; 1990
20. Byock IR, Caplan A, Snyder L. Beyond symptom managements: physician roles and responsibilities in palliative care. In: Snyder L, Quill TE, eds. Physician's Guide to End-of-life Care. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians, American Society of Internal Medicine; 2001