The Misgav Ladach method: A step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section

Kathmandu University Medical Journal

Volumn 4 NO. 2, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 198-202

  Poonam, ^a,b   Banerjee, B ^a   Singh, S N ^a   Raina, A ^a  

^a BPKIHS   (Nepal)

^b B P KOIRALA INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Nepal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 33746696108     PISSN: 18122027     EISSN: 18122078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for caesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 615 21.
2. Darj E Nordstrom ML, The Misgav Ladach Method for caesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:37 41
3. Magann EF, Washburne JF, Harris RL, Bass JD, Duff WP, Morrison JC. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after caesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 517 20
4. Wilkinson CS, Enkin MW. Manual removal of the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000130
5. Mert Gol, Ali Baloglu, Cetin Aydin, Leylant Ova, Umur Yensel and Levent Karci, Does manual removal of the placenta affect operative blood loss during caesarean section?, Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod.Biol. Volume 112 Issue 1 15 (2004), pp. 57-60.
6. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167(4 Pt 1): 1108 11
7. Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One-versus two-layer closure of a low transverse caesarean:the next pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 16 8
8. Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodkins P, Owen J, Winkler CL. Trial of labor after a one- or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 545 6
9. Durnwald C, Mercer B. Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189: 925 9
10. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326 30
11. Grundsell H,Rizk D, Kumar R Randomized study of non closure of peritoneum in lower segment caesarean section.Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1998; 77: 110-15
12. Moreira P, Moreau JC, Faye ME, Ka S, Kane Gueye SM, Faye EOet al. Comparison of two caesarean techniques: classic versusMisgav-Ladach caesarean. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris)2002; 31:572 6
13. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Caesarean section using the Misgav- Ladach method.Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 57:273 9