NUANCE: Naturalistic University of Alberta Nonlinear Correlation Explorer

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 8-23

  Hollis, Geoff ^a   Westbury, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33746677615     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192745     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
2. FRAUMENI, J. F., JR. (1968). Cigarette smoking and cancers of the urinary tract: Geographic variation in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 41, 1205-1211.
3. HOLLAND, J. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. KOZA, J. (1992). Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. KUSHCHU, I. (2002). Genetic programming and evolutionary generalization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 431-442.
6. LANGDON, W. B. (2000). Quadratic bloat in genetic programming. In D. Whitley, D. Goldberg, E. Cantu-Paz, L. Spector, I. Parmee, & H. Beyer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000) (pp. 451-458). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. LANGDON, W. B., & POLI, R. (1997). Fitness causes bloat (Tech. Rep. No. CSRP-97-09). Birmingham, U.K.: University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science.
8. LUKE, S., & SPECTOR, L. (1998). A revised comparison of crossover and mutation in genetic programming. In J. Koza, W. Banzhaf, K. Chellapilla, K. Deb, M. Dorigo, D. B. Fogel, et al. (Eds.), Genetic programming 1998: Proceedings of the Third Annual Genetic Programming Conference (pp. 51-84). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. MOORE, F. W., & GARCIA, O. N. (1997). A new methodology for reducing brittleness in genetic programming. In E. Pohl (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics 1997 Conference (pp. 757-763). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
10. SOULE, T., & FOSTER, J. A. (1998). Removal bias: A new cause of code growth in tree based evolutionary programming. In D. Fogel (Ed.), 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 781-786). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
11. SOULE, T., & FOSTER, J. A. (1999). Effects of code growth and parsimony pressure on populations in genetic programming. Evolutionary Computation, 6, 293-309.
12. STONE, M. (1974). Cross-validation choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 36, 111-147.
13. STREETER, M. J. (2003). The root causes of code growth in genetic programming. In C. Ryan, T. Soule, M. Keijzer, E. Tsang, R. Poli, & E. Costa (Eds.), Genetic programming: Proceedings of EuroGP 2003 (pp. 449-458). Berlin: Springer.
14. WESTBURV, C., BUCHANAN, L., SANDERSON, M., RHEMTULLA, M., & PHILLIPS, L. (2003). Using genetic programming to discover nonlinear variable interactions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 202-216.
15. WOLFRAM RESEARCH, INC. (2003). Mathematica (Version 5.0) [Computer program]. Champaign, IL: Author.