Model Checking of Component Behavior Specification: A Real Life Experience

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Volumn 160, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 197-210

  Jezek, Pavel ^a   Kofron, Jan ^a   Plasil, Frantisek ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Component behaviour; model checking; verification

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROGRAM DEBUGGING; STATE SPACE METHODS;

COMPONENT BEHAVIOUR; MODEL CHECKING; STATE SPACE VISUALIZATION; VERIFICATION;

NETWORK COMPONENTS;

EID: 33746675634     PISSN: 15710661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2006.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Plasil F., and Visnovsky S. Behavior Protocols for Software Components. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 11 (Nov 2002)
2. Adamek J., and Plasil F. Component Composition Errors and Update Atomicity: Static Analysis. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 17 4 (2005) John Wiley
3. PREfast. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/tools/PREfast.mspx
4. Bruneton E., Coupaye T., Leclerc M., Quema V., and Stefani J.-B. An Open Component Model and Its Support in Java. 7th SIGSOFT International Symposimum on Component-Based Software Engineering. (CBSE7), Edinburgh, Scotland. LNCS 3054 (May 2004)
5. Magee J., and Kramer J. Concurrency: State models & Java programs (1999), John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 0-471-98710-7
6. SDV. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/tools/SDV.mspx
7. Ball T., and Rajamani S.K. The SLAM Project: Debugging System Software via Static Analysis. POPL 2002 (Jan 2002), ACM
8. WDM. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/wdm.mspx
9. Spin, Promela. http://spinroot.com/spin
10. Bandera. http://bandera.projects.cis.ksu.edu
11. Java Pathfinder. http://javapathfinder.sourceforge.net
12. SMV. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~modelcheck/smv.html
13. GraphViz. http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz
14. Mach M., Plasil F., and Kofron J. Behavior Protocol Verification: Fighting State Explosion. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, ACIS 6 1 (Mar 2005)
15. Wright. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~able/wright
16. SOFA. http://sofa.objectweb.org
17. Bogor. http://bogor.projects.cis.ksu.edu
18. BLAST. http://www-cad.eecs.berkeley.edu/~blast
19. Moped. http://www.fmi.uni-stuttgart.de/szs/tools/moped
20. MAGIC. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~chaki/magic
21. Kumar N., Kumar V., and Viswanathan M. On the Complexity of Error Explanation. VMCAI'05 (2005), ACM
22. Ball T., Naik M., and Rajamani S. From symptom to cause: Localizing errors in counterexample traces. Proceedings of POPL 2003 (2003), ACM
23. Groce A., and Visser W. What went wrong: Explaining counterexamples. Proceedings of the SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software. LNCS 2648 (2003), Springer
24. Zeller A. Isolating cause-effect chains for computer programs. Proceedings of FSE 2002 (2002), ACM