The of effect patient on contrast enhancement during CT of the pancreatobiliary region

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 187, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 505-510

  Itoh, Shigeki ^a   Ikeda, Mitsuru ^a   Satake, Hiroko ^b   Ota, Toyohiro ^b   Ishigaki, Takeo ^b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Dynamic CT; MDCT; Pancreaticobiliary imaging

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AORTA; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEVICE; DOSE CALCULATION; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFUSION RATE; LIVER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SPLENIC VEIN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; BILE DUCT DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCT DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33746659813     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0541     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Itoh S, Dceda M, Achiwa M, Ota T, Satake H, Ishigaki T. Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:1085-1094
2. Awai K, Hori S. Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT. Eur Radial 2003; 13:2155-2160
3. Nino-Murcia M, Tamma EP, Charnsangavej C, Jeffrey RB Jr. Multidetector-row helical CT and advanced postprocessing techniques for the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28:366-377
4. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, Satake H, Takai K, Ishigaki T. Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 2003;13:277-285
5. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, Jeffey RB Jr. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR 2004; 182:419-425
6. Takada A, Itoh S, Suzuki K, et al. Branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous tumors: diagnostic value of multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1888-1897
7. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Satake H, Iwano S, Ishigaki T. Late-arterial and portal-venous phase imaging of the liver with a multislice CT scanner in patients without circulatory disturbances: automatic bolus tracking or empirical scan delay? Eur Radial 2004;14:1665-1673
8. Itoh S, Suzuki K, Iwano S, et al. Three-phase CT examination of the pancreatobiliary region using multislice CT with 1-mm collimation. Radiat Med 2005; 23:283-291
9. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 1998; 207:647-655
10. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999; 210:97-101
11. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, et al. Pancreatic CT imaging: effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material. Radiology 1999; 212:219-225
12. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995; 195:353-357
13. Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material-a prospective randomized study. Radiology 2000; 216:718-723
14. Tello R, Seltzer SE, Polger M, Spaulding S, Savci G. A contrast agent delivery nomogram for hepatic spiral CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:236-245
15. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998; 207:657-662
16. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate-pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 1998; 206:455-464
17. Fleischmann D, Hittmair K. Mathematical analysis of arterial enhancement and optimization of bolus geometry for CT angiography using the discrete Fourier transform. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:474-484
18. Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 2000; 216:872-880
19. Oliver JH, Baron RL. Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 1996; 201:1-14
20. Sheiman RG, Raptopoulos V, Caruso P, Vrachliotis T, Pearlman J. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delay for CT angiography of the abdomen. AJR 1996; 167:725-729
21. Ichikawa T, Kitamura T, Nakajima H, Sou H, Tsukamoto T, Ikenaga S, Araki T. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: can double arterial phase imaging with multidetector CT improve tumor depiction in the cirrhotic liver? AJR 2002; 179:751-758