A parallel proposition bank ii for chinese and english

Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotations II: Pie in the Sky@ACL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 61-67

  Palmer, Martha ^a   Xue, Nianwen ^a   Babko Malaya, Olga ^a   Chen, Jinying ^a   Snyder, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COARSE-GRAINED; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; SECOND PHASE; SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS; TREEBANKS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 33746659117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Olga Babko-Malaya and Martha Palmer. 2005. Proposition Bank II: Delving Deeper. In Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, Workshop in conjunction with HLT/NAACL 2004, Boston, Massachusetts.
2. Olga Babko-Malaya, Martha Palmer, Nianwen Xue, Aravind Joshi, and Seth Kulick. 2004. Exploiting Interactions between Different Types of Semantic Annotation. In Proceeding of ICWS-6, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
3. C. Baker, C. Fillmore, and J. Lowe. 1998. The berkeley framenet project. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, Singapore.
4. E. Charniak. 2001. Immediate-head Parsing for Language Models. In ACL-01.
5. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D.Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
6. M. Ellsworth, K. Erk, P. Kingsbury, and S. Pado. 2004. PropBank, SALSA and FrameNet: How design determines product. In Proceedings of the LREC 2004 Workshop on Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora, Lisbon, Portugal.
7. Charles J. Fillmore and B. T. Atkins. 1998. FrameNet and lexical relevantce. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, Spain.
8. Eva Hajicova and Iyona Kucerova. 2002. Argument/ Valency Structure in PropBank, LCS Database and Prague Dependency Treebank: A Comparative Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 846 851.
9. Christopher R. Johnson, Charles J. Fillmore, Miriam R. L. Petruck, Collin Baker, Michael Ellsworth, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Esther J. Wood. 2002. FrameNet: Theory and Practice, Version 1.0, www.icsi.berkeley.edu/framenet.
10. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics.
11. Mitchell Marcus, Grace Kim, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, et al. 1994. The Penn Treebank: Annotating Predicate Argument Structure. In Proc of ARPA speech and Natural language workshop.
12. E. Miltsakaki, R. Prasad, A. Joshi, and B. Webber. 2004. The Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal.
13. Martha Palmer, Olga Babko-Malaya, and Hoa Dang. 2004. Different Sense Granularities for Different Applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding Systems, Boston, Mass.
14. Martha Palmer, Dan Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1).
15. Martha Palmer, Hoa Trang Dang, and Christiane Fellbaum.To appear. Making fine-grained and coarsegrained sense distinctions, both manually and automatically. Journal of Natural Language Engineering.
16. Nianwen Xue and Martha Palmer. 2003. Annotating the Propositions in the Penn Chinese Treebank. In The Proceedings of the 2nd SIGHANWorkshop on Chinese Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan.
17. Nianwen Xue, Fei Xia, Fu dong Chiou, and Martha Palmer. To appear. The Penn Chinese Treebank: Phrase Structure Annotation of a Large Corpus. Natural Language Engineering.
18. Nianwen Xue. To appear. Annotating the Discourse Connectives in the Chinese Treebank. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.