Three-way entanglement and three-qubit phase gate based on a coherent six-level atomic system

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Hang, Chao ^a   Li, Yun ^a   Ma, Lei ^a   Huang, Guoxiang ^a  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHERENT LIGHT; MAGNETOELECTRIC EFFECTS; QUANTUM OPTICS; QUANTUM THEORY; TRANSPARENCY;

ATOMIC SYSTEMS; FIFTH ORDER NONLINEARITY; QUANTUM PHASE GATE; TOFFOLI GATE;

NONLINEAR OPTICS;

EID: 33746656801     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.012319     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
2. K. J. Boller, A. Imamoglu, and S. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2593 66, 2593 (1991).
3. S. E. Harris, Phys. Today PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/1.881886 50, 36 (1997).
4. M. D. Lukin, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.457 75, 457 (2003).
5. M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.633 77, 633 (2005), and references therein.
6. H. Schmidt and A. Imamoglu, Opt. Lett. OPLEDP 0146-9592 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1107 21, 1936 (1996).
7. H. Kang and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.093601 91, 093601 (2003).
8. A. D. Greentree, D. Richards, J. A. Vaccaro, A. V. Durrant, S. R. de Echaniz, D. Segal, and J. P. Marangos, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.023818 67, 023818 (2003).
9. D. Petrosyan and Yu. P. Malakyan, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.023822 70, 023822 (2004).
10. D. Petrosyan and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033833 65, 033833 (2002).
11. M. D. Lukin and P. R. Hemmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2818 84, 2818 (2000);
12. M. D. Lukin, S. F. Yelin, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4232 84, 4232 (2000).
13. M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim, and B. S. Ham, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.023811 67, 023811 (2003).
14. M. G. Payne and L. Deng, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.123602 91, 123602 (2003).
15. M. Kiffner and K.-P. Marzlin, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.033811 71, 033811 (2005).
16. A. Peng, M. Johnsson, W. P. Bowen, P. K. Lam, H.-A. Bachor, and J. J. Hope, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.033809 71, 033809 (2005).
17. I. Friedler, D. Petrosyan, M. Fleischhauer, and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.043803 72, 043803 (2005).
18. C. Ottaviani, D. Vitali, M. Artoni, F. Cataliotti, and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.197902 90, 197902 (2003).
19. S. Rebić, D. Vitali, C. Ottaviani, P. Tombesi, M. Artoni, F. Cataliotti, and R. Corbalán, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.032317 70, 032317 (2004).
20. A. Joshi and M. Xiao, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72. 062319 72, 062319 (2005).
21. Y. Li, C. Hang, L. Ma, and G. Huang, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 354, 1 (2006
22. M. S. Zubairy, A. B. Matsko, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.043804 65, 043804 (2002);
23. A. B. Matsko, I. Novikova, G. R. Welch, and M. S. Zubairy, Opt. Lett. OPLEDP 0146-9592 28, 96 (2003).
24. J. K. Pachos and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.107902 91, 107902 (2003).
25. L.-M. Duan, B. Wang, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032333 72, 032333 (2005).
26. P. K. Gagnebin, S. R. Skinner, E. C. Behrman, J. E. Steck, Z. Zhou, and S. Han, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042311 72, 042311 (2005).
27. M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022309 73, 022309 (2006).
28. In fact, Eq. 1 can be considered to be approximately equivalent to optical Bloch equations for density matrix by defining, e.g., Γ2 = Ej < E2 Γ2j + γ12, where Γ2j is the decay rate of the atom from state to state, γ12 = γ11 + γ22 is the composite dephasing rate with γjj being the dephasing rate of the state (j=1,2).
29. For detail, see C. Ottaviani, S. Rebić, D. Vitali, and P. Tombesi, e-print physics/0510200 (unpublished).
30. H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten, Laser Cooling and Trapping (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999).
31. M. D. Lukin and A. Imamoǧlu, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1419 84, 1419 (2000).
32. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306 61, 052306 (2000).