Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring vs. intermittent auscultation in postcesarean pregnancies

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 123-125

  Madaan, Monika ^a   Trivedi, Shubha Sagar ^a  

^a LADY HARDINGE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Electronic fetal monitoring; Intermittent auscultation; Postcesarean pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BRADYCARDIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PALPATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TACHYCARDIA; UTERUS CONTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 33746638703     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Vintzileos A.M., Ansaklis A., Varvarigos I., Papas C., Softazis I., and Montgomery J.I. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Obstet Gynecol 8 (1993) 894-907
2. Thacker B.S., Stroup D.F., and Peterson H.B. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal heart monitoring, an update. Obstet Gynecol 86 (1995) 613-620
3. Thacker B.S., and Stroup D.F. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 (2001) [CD 000063]
4. Flamm B., Macdonald D., Shearer E., and Mahan C.S. Roundtable discussion: should electronic fetal monitoring always be used for women in labor who are having a vaginal birth after previous cesarean section ?. Birth 19 (1992 (1 Mar)) 31-35