Sonographic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease and comparison with retained products of conception

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 985-993

  Betel, Cara ^a,c   Atri, Mostafa ^a   Arenson, Anna Marie ^a   Khalifa, Mahmoud ^a   Osborne, Raymond ^a   Tomlinson, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gestational trophoblastic disease; Molar pregnancy; Retained products of conception; Sonography

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; MEDICINE; ONCOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS; ULTRASONICS;

GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE; MOLAR PREGNANCY; RETAINED PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION; SONOGRAPHY;

SONOCHEMISTRY;

ADULT; ASCITES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVARY CYST; PLACENTA CIRCULATION; RETAINED PLACENTA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SYSTOLE; THICKNESS; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TROPHOBLASTIC TUMOR;

EID: 33746637634     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.8.985     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau J. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co; 1998.
2. Kohorn EI. Problems with nomenclature and pharmacodynamics in trophoblastic disease. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:203-204.
3. Rose PG. Hydatidiform mole: diagnosis and management. Semin Oncol 1995; 22:149-156.
4. Soto-Wright V, Bernstein M, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. The changing clinical presentation of complete molar pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:775-779.
5. Miyasaka Y, Hachiya J, Furuya Y, Seki T, Hiromu W. CT evaluation of invasive trophoblastic disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9:459-462.
6. Davis WK, McCarthy S, Moss AA, Braga C. Computed tomography of gestational trophoblastic disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:1136-1139.
7. Walsh JW. Computed tomography of gynecologic neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:817-830.
8. Sanders C, Rubin E. Malignant gestational trophoblastic disease: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 165-168.
9. Maldjian C, Schnall MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of the uterine body, cervix, and adnexa. Semin Roentgenol 1996; 31:257-266.
10. Xiang Y, Yang X, Yang N, Song H. A comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and pelvic arteriogram in assessment of patients with gestational trophoblastic tumour. Chin Med Sci J 1998; 13:45-48.
11. Green CL, Angtuaco TL, Shah HR, Parmley TH. Gestational trophoblastic disease: a spectrum of radiologic diagnosis. Radiographics 1996; 16:1371-1384.
12. Romero R, Horgan JG, Kohorn EI, Kadar N, Taylor KJ, Hobbins JC. New criteria for the diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:553-558.
13. Fleischer AC, James AE r, Krause DA, Millis JB. Sonographic patterns in trophoblastic disease. Radiology 1978; 126:215-220.
14. Keogan MT, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA. Low resistance Doppler waveforms with retained products of conception. Eur J Radiol 1995; 21:109-111.
15. Reid MH, McGahan JP, Oi R. Sonographic evaluation of hydatidiform mole and its look-alikes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:307-311.
16. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Evolving concepts of molar pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1991; 36:40-43.
17. Naumoff P, Szulman AE, Weinstein B, Mazer J, Surti U. Ultrasonography of partial hydatidiform mole. Radiology 1981; 140:467-470.