Social administration and outcomes for consumers: What do we know?

Administration in Social Work

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 11-24

  Poertner, John ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Administrative behavior; Consumer outcomes; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746621698     PISSN: 03643107     EISSN: 15444376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J147v30n02_03     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ahearn, K. K. (1999). The impact of supervisory behavior on permanency rates for foster children in a child welfare context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
2. Corrigan, P. W., Lickey, S.E., Campion, J., & Rashid, F. (2000). Mental health team leadership and consumer satisfaction and quality of life. Psychiatric Services, 51(6), 781-785.
3. Ezell, M., Menefee, D., & Patti, R. J. (1989) Managerial leadership and service quality: Toward a model of social work administration. Administration in Social Work, 13 (3/4), 77-98.
4. Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80(4), 341-350.
5. Gibbs, L., & Gambrill, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice: Counter-arguments to objections. Research on Social Work Practice, 72(3), 452-476.
6. Gira, E.C., Kessler, M.L., & Poertner, J. (2004). Influencing social workers to use research evidence in practice: Lessons from medicine and the allied health professions. Research in Social Work Practice, 14(2), 68-79.
7. Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorgani/ational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(5), 401-421.
8. Grasso, A. J. (1994). Management style, job satisfaction, and service effectiveness. Administration in Social Work, 18(4), 89-105
9. Harkness, D. (1995). The art. of helping in supervised practice: Skills, relationships, and outcomes. Clinical Supervisor, 13(1), 63-76.
10. Harkness, D. (1997). Testing interactional social work theory: A panel analysis of supervised practice and outcomes. Clinical Supervisor, 15(1), 33-50.
11. Harkness, D., & Hensley, H. (1991). Changing the focus of social work supervision: Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Work, 36 (6), 506-512.
12. Harkness, D., & Poertner, J. (1989, March). Social work supervision: A review of the literature. Social Work, 34(2), 115-119.
13. Littell, J. H., & Tajima, E. A. (2000). A multilevel model of client participation in intensive family preservation services. Social Service Review, 74(3), 405-435
14. Martin, P.Y., & Segal, S. (1977). Bureaucracy, size, and staff expectations for client, independence in halfway houses. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 18 (December), 376-390.
15. Patti, R. J., (1985). In search of purpose for social welfare administration. Administration in Social Work, 9(3), 1-14.
16. Patti, R. J., (2000). The landscape of social welfare management. In R. J. Patti (Ed.), The Handbook of Social Welfare Management (pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks: CA Sage Publications, Inc.
17. Rapp, C., Hardcastle, D., Rosenzweig, J., & Poertner, J. (1983, Fall/Winter). The status of research in social service management. Administration in Social Work, 7(3/4), 89-100.
18. Sosin, M. R. (1986). Administrative issues in substitute care. Social Service Review, 60(3), 360-377.
19. Yeaman, C., Craine, W.H., Gorsek, J., & Corrigan, P.W. (2000). Performance improvement teams for better psychiatric rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 27(3), 113-127.