Mobile computing: A user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 292-300

  Wakefield, Robin L ^a   Whitten, Dwayne ^b  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive absorption; Hedonic; Mobile computing; Playfulness; TAM; Utilitarian

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746617331     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000619     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AGARWAL R and KARAHANNA E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24(4), 665-694.
2. AGGARWAL P and LAW S (2005) Role of relationship norms in processing brand information, Journal of Consumer Research 32(3), 453-464.
3. AJZEN I and FISHBEIN M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4. BAKER J, PARASURAMAN A, GREWAL D and Voss G (2002) The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions, Journal of Marketing 66(2), 120-141.
5. BARONE MJ, TAYLOR VA and URBANY JE (2005) Advertising signaling effects for new brands: the moderating role of perceived brand difference. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13(1), 1-13.
6. BECKER D (2002) Sega forms mobile games division. News.com April 17.
7. BRECKLER S (1984) Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 1191-1205.
8. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI M (1975) Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: the Experience of Play in Work and Games. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9. DAVIS FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3), 318-339.
10. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14), 1111-1132.
11. DECI EL (1975) Intrinsic Motivation. Plenum Press, New York.
12. GHANI JA and DESHPANDE SP (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction, Journal of Psychology 128(4), 381-391.
13. HAIR JF, ANDERSON RE, TATHAM RL and BLACK WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. ISLAM N and FAYAD M (2003) Towards ubiquitous acceptance of ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 46(2), 89-94.
15. LIEBERMAN JN (1977) Playfulness. Academic Press, New York, NY.
16. MATHIESON K (1991) Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2(3), 173-191.
17. MCCRAE RR and COSTA Jr. PT (1983) Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences 4(3), 245-255.
18. MILLER M and TESSER A (1986) Effects of affect and cognitive focus on the attitude/behavior relationship, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 270-276.
19. ROCHE SM and MCCONKEY KM (1990) Absorption: nature, assessment, and correlates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(1), 91-101.
20. SCHACTER S and SINGER J (1962) Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional states. Psychological Review 65, 379-399.
21. SZAJNA B (1996) Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42(1), 85-92.
22. TAYLOR S and TODD PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6(2), 144-176.
23. TELLEGEN A and ATKINSON G (1974) Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences, a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83, 268-277.
24. TREVINO LK and WEBSTER J (1992) Flow in computer-mediated communication: electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research 19(5), 539-573.
25. VAN DER HEIJDEN H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(4), 695-704.
26. VARSHNEY U and VETTER R (2000) Emerging mobile and wireless networks. Communications of the ACM 43(6), 73-82.
27. VENKATESH V (1999) Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 23(2), 239-260.
28. VENKATESH V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 (4), 342-365.
29. VENKATESH V and DAVIS FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal case studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204.
30. WEBSTER J and Ho H (1997) Audience engagement in multi-media presentations. Data Base for the Advances in Information Systems 28(2), 63-77.
31. WEBSTER J and MARTOCCHIO JJ (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications, MIS Quarterly 16(2), 201-226.
32. WEBSTER J and MARTOCCHIO JJ (1993) Turning work into play: implications for microcomputer software training, Journal of Management 19(1), 127-146.
33. WILD TC, KUIKEN D and SCHOPFLOCHER D (1995) The role of absorption in experiential involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(3), 569-579.