Influence processes in leadership-followership: Inclusion and the idiosyncrasy credit model

Advances in Social and Organizational Psychology: A Tribute to Ralph Rosnow

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 293-312

  Hollander, Edwin P ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746604424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617446     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Aditya, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2002). Executive intelligence and interpersonal acumen:Aconceptual framework. In B. Pattanayak & V. Gupta (Eds.), Creating performing organizations:International perspectives for Indian management (pp. 225-246). New Delhi: Sage/Response.
2. Alvarez, R. (1968). Informal reactions to deviance in simulated work organizations: A laboratory experiment. American Sociological Review, 33, 895-912.
3. Argyle, M., & Little, B. R. (1972). Do personality traits apply to social behavior? Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 2(1), 1-35.
4. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
5. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. NewYork: Free Press.
6. Bensimon, E. M. (1993). New presidents' initial actions: Transactional and transformational leadership. Journal for Higher Education Management, 8(2), 5-17.
7. Ben-Yoav, O., Hollander, E. P., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1983). Leader legitimacy, leader-follower interaction, and followers' ratings of the leader. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 111-115.
8. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Chemers, M. M. (1993). An integrative theory of leadership. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 293-319). San Diego: Academic Press.
10. Corry, J. (1993). My Times. New York: Putnam.
11. Curphy, G. J. (1993). An empirical investigation of the effects of transformational and transactional leadership on organizational climate, attrition, and performance. In K. E. Clark, M. B. Clark, & D. P. Campbell (Eds.), Impact of leadership (pp. 177-188). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
12. Denmark, F. L. (1977). Styles of leadership. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 2, 99-113.
13. Denmark, F. L. (1993). Women, leadership, and empowerment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 343-356.
14. DeVries, D. L. (1992). Executive selection: advances but no progress. Center for Creative Leadership: Issues and Observations, 12, 1-5.
15. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (1998). Atale of two corporations: Managing uncertainty during organizational change. Human Resource Management, 37(3 & 4), 295-303.
16. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2000). How top PR professionals handle hearsay: Corporate rumors, their effects, ad strategies to manage them. Public Relations Review, 26(2), 173-190.
17. DiFonzo, N., Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 47-62.
18. Ehrlich, S. B., Meindl, J. R., & Viellieu, B. (1990). The charismatic appeal of a transformational leader:Anempirical case study of a small, high technology contractor. Leadership Quarterly, 1(4), 229-247.
19. Estrada, M., Brown, J., & Lee, F. (1995) Who gets the credit? Perceptions of idiosyncrasy credit in work groups. Small Group Research, 26(1), 56-76.
20. Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to effective leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performance. New York: Wiley.
21. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
22. Geis, L. (1968). Machiavellianism in a semi-real world. Paper presented at the 76th Annual APA Convention.
23. Gerber, G. L. (2001). Women and men police officers: Status, gender, and personality. Westport, CT: Praeger.
24. Gleason, J.M., Seaman, F. J., & Hollander, E. P. (1978). Emergent leadership processes as a function of task structure and Machiavellianism. Social Behavior andPersonality, 6, 33-36.
25. Hogan, R., Raskin, R., & Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of charisma. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of Leadership (pp. 343-354). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
26. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
27. Hollander, E. P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 365-369.
28. Hollander, E. P. (1961). Some effects of perceived status on responses to innovative behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 247-250.
29. Hollander, E. P. (1964). Leaders, groups, and influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Hollander, E. P. (1978a). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.
31. Hollander, E. P. (1978b). What is the crisis of leadership? Humanitas, 14, 285-296.
32. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
33. Hollander, E. P. (1986). On the central role of leadership processes. International Review of Applied Psychology, 35, 39-52.
34. Hollander, E. P. (1992a). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 71-75.
35. Hollander, E. P. (1992b). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3(1), 43-54.
36. Hollander, E. P. (1993). Legitimacy, power, and influence: A perspective on relational features of leadership. In M. Chemers and R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research:Perspectives and directions (pp. 29-47). San Diego: Academic Press.
37. Hollander, E. P. (1995a). Ethical challenges in the leader-follower relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 55-65.
38. Hollander, E. P. (2004). Idiosyncrasy credit: Upward influence. In Encyclopedia of Leadership (pp. 695-700; 1605-1609). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire/SAGE.
39. Hollander, E. P. (1995b). Organizational leadership and followership: The role of interpersonal relations. In P. Collett & A. Furnham (Eds.), Social psychology at work: Essays in honour of Michael Argyle (pp. 69-87). London: Routledge.
40. Hollander, E. P., Fallon, B. J., & Edwards, M. T. (1977). Some aspects of influence and acceptability for appointed and elected group leaders. Journal of Psychology, 95, 289-296.
41. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J.W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387-397.
42. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J.W. (1970). Studies in leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In L. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 33-69). New York: Academic Press.
43. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J.W. (1978). Afurther look at leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 153-165). New York: Academic Press.
44. Hollander, E. P., & Kelly, D. R. (1990, March). Rewards from leaders as perceived by followers. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
45. Hollander, E. P., & Kelly, D. R. (1992). Appraising relational qualities of leadership and followership. Paper presented at the 25th International Congress ofPsychology, Brussels.
46. Hollander, E. P., & Neider, L. (1978, August). Critical incidents and rating scales in comparing "good" and "bad" leadership. Paper presented at the APA Convention, Toronto.
47. Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179-189.
48. Hollander, E. P., Schwager, E., Russeva, K., & Nassauer, F. (1996). Intangible rewards contributing to leader-follower relations. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Psychology, Montreal.
49. Hollander, E. P., & Yoder, J. (1980). Some issues in comparing women and men as leaders. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 267-280.
50. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
51. House, R., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic and visionary theories. In M.M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 81-107). San Diego:Academic Press.
52. Hovland, C. I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 14, 8-17.
53. Howell, J.M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executive, 6, 43-54.
54. Jacobs, T. O. (1970). Leadership and exchange in formal organizations. Alexandria, VA:Human Resources Research Organization.
55. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. NewYork:Wiley.
56. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
57. Kelley, R. L. (1992). The power of followership. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
58. Kelly, D., Julien, T., & Hollander, E. P. (1992, April). Further effects of good and bad leadership revealed by critical incidents and rating scales. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.
59. Komaki, J. L. (1998). Leadership from an operant perspective. London: Routledge.
60. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates." Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
62. Lewis, S., Langan, C., & Hollander, E. P. (1972). Expectations of future interaction and the choice of less desirable alternatives in conformity. Sociometry, 15, 440-447.
63. Locke, E. A. (Ed.). (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from industrial-organizational psychology, organizational behavior, and human resources. New York: Simon & Schuster.
64. Lord, R.G., & Maher, K. J. (1988). Leadership perceptions and leadership performance:Two distinct but interdependent processes. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Advances in applied social psychology: Business settings (Vol. 4, pp. 129-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. McCall, M.W., Lombardo, M. M. & Morrison, A. M. (1988). The lessons of experience. Ashland, MA: Lexington.
66. Neustadt, R. (1990). Presidential power. New York: Wiley.
67. Offermann, L.R. (2004). Whenfollowers become toxic. Harvard Business Review, 87(1), 55-60.
68. Offermann, L. R., & Schrier, P. E. (1985). Social influence strategies: The impact of sex, role and attitudes toward power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 286-300.
69. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
70. Post, J.M. (1986). Narcissism and the charismatic leader-follower relationship. Political Psychology, 7, 675-688.
71. Reich, R. B. (1987). Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero. HarvardBusiness Review, 65(3), 77-83.
72. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
73. Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. (1976). Rumor and gossip. New York: Elsevier.
74. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.
75. Schwager, E., Julien, T., Kelly, D., & Hollander, E. P. (1993, April). What women and men perceive about good and bad leadership: Further findings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Arlington, VA.
76. Wahrman, R., & Pugh, M.D. (1974). Sex, nonconformity and influence. Sociometry, 37, 137-147.
77. Wallace, J. L. (1996). An examination of comparable behavioral and motivational features of transactional and transformational leadership as regards effectiveness and follower satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Baruch College and Graduate Center, City University of New York.
78. Weber, M. (1946). The sociology of charismatic authority (H. H. Gerth & C.W. Mills, Trans.). In H. H. Gerth & C.W. Mills (Eds.), Essays in sociology (pp. 245-252). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original essay published 1921)
79. Weick, K. E. (1969). Social psychology in an era of social change. American Psychologist, 24, 990-998.