An integration of the analytic hierarchy process into the quality function deployment process

International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 180-188

  Dweiri, Fikri T ^a   Kablan, Mahmoud M ^b  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

^b MUTAH UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Adjustment factors; AHP; Customer requirements; Ease of implementation; QFD

Indexed keywords

AIR CONDITIONING; COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

ADJUSTMENT FACTORS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; EASE OF IMPLEMENTATION;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746590305     PISSN: 10724761     EISSN: 1943670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agus, A. (2001). A linear structural modeling of total quality management practices in manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Total Quality Management. 12:561-573.
2. Boucher, T. O., Gogus, O. and Wicks, E. M. (1997). A comparison between two multiattribute decision methodologies used in capital investment decision analysis. The Engineering Economist. 42:179-202.
3. Calantone, R. J., Di Benedetto, C. A., and Schmidt, J. B. (1999). Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 16:65-76.
4. Cristiano, JJ, Likr, JK, White, CC. (2000). Customer-driven product development through quality function deployment in US and Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 17:286-308.
5. Govers, CPM. (2001). QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management. International Journal of Production Economics. 69:151-159.
6. Haapalainen, M., Kivistö-Rahnasto J., and Mattila M. (1999/2000). Ergonomic design of non-powered hand tools: An application of quality function deployment (QFD). Occupational Ergonomics. 2:179-189.
7. Kauffmann, P., Ricks, W. R., and Shockcor, J. (1999). Research portfolio analysis using extensions of quality function deployment. Engineering Management Journal. 11:3-9.
8. th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.,
9. nd Edition. Prentice-Hall. New Jersey.
10. Partovi, F. Y. (1999). A quality function deployment approach to strategic capital budgeting, The Engineering Economist. 44:239-260
11. Partovi, F. Y., Burton, J., and Banerjee, A. (1990). Application of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. International Journal of Production Management. 10:5-23
12. Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press. New York.
13. Prasad, B. (2000). A concurrent function deployment technique for a workgroup-based engineering design process. Journal of Engineering Design 11:102-119.
14. Satty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill. New York.
15. Sivaloganathan, S., Andres, P. T. J., and Shahin, T. M. M. (2001). Design function deployment: A tutorjal introduction. Journal of Engineering Design.12:59-74
16. Spencer, M. S. and Loomba, A. P. S. (2001). Total quality management at smaller manufacturers: Benchmarking techniques and results. Total Quality Management. 12:689-695.
17. Udo, Goodwin G. (2000). Using analytical hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 100:421-429.
18. Verma, D., Chilakapati R., Fabrycky W. J. (1998). Analyzing a quality function deployment matrix: An expert system-based approach to identify inconsistencies and opportunities. Journal of Engineering Design. 9:251-261.
19. Xie M., Goh TN, and Wang H. (1998). A study of the sensitivity of "Customer Voice" in QFD analysis. International journal of Industrial Engineering.5:301-307