Safety and detailed patterns of morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of prostate in a urologist-led unit

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 281-285

  Lee, George ^a   Attar, Kakahama ^a   Laniado, Marc ^a   Karim, Omer ^a  

^a WEXHAM PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Morbidity; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Safety

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CIPROFLOXACIN; GENTAMICIN; METRONIDAZOLE; QUINOLINE DERIVED ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION DISORDER; MORBIDITY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAIN; PATIENT COUNSELING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; SAFETY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; UROLOGY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMATURIA; HUMANS; MALE; MORBIDITY; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECTAL DISEASES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; URINARY RETENTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS; UROLOGY;

EID: 33746577415     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-006-6671-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. KK Hodge JE McNeal MK Terris 1989 Random systemic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 712659827 1:STN:280:BiaB1c%2FgslY%3D
2. G Aus CG Hermannson J Hugosson et al 1993 Tranrectal ultrasound examination of prostate: Complications and acceptance by patients Br J Urol 71 4578499990 1:STN:280:ByyB2s3gvFM%3D
3. KR Ghani D Dundas U Patel 2004 Bleeding after tranrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: A study of 7-day morbidity after six-, eight- and 12-core biopsyprotocol BJU Int 94 7 1014-1020 15541119 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05096.x
4. CK Naughton DK Ornstein DS Smith et al 2000 Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomised trial of 6 versus 12 cores J Urol 163 168-171 10604338 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FmslyhtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67996-7
5. B Djavan M Waldert A Zlotta et al. 2001 Safety and morbidity of first and repeated transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study J Urol 166 856-860 11490233 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvksVShtg%3D%3D 10.1016/ S0022-5347(05)65851-X
6. CE Lee-Elliott D Dundas U Patel 2004 Randomised trial of lidocaine vs lidocaine/bupivacaine periprostatic injection on longitudinal pain scores after prostate biopsy J Urol 163 158-162
7. JL Gore SF Shariat BJ Miles 2001 Optimal combinations of systemic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer J Urol 165 1554-1559 11342916 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ovVOitw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66347-1
8. LV Rodriguez MK Terris 1998 Risk and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: A prospective study and review of the literature J Urol 160 21159817335 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjt1antQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62255-9
9. S Torp-Pedersen F Lee PJ Littrup et al 1989 Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided with trans-rectal US. Longitudinal and multiplanar scanning Radiology 170 23-27 2642344 1:STN:280:BiaD2s3htVA%3D
10. K Mutaguchi K Shinohara A Matsubara 2005 Local anaesthesia during 10 core biopsy of prostate: Comparison of 2 methods J Urol 173 742-745 15711260 10.1097/01.ju.0000152119.28959.3a
11. T Mkinen A Auvinen M Hakama et al 2002 Acceptability and complications of prostate biopsy in population based PSA screening versus routine clinical practice: A prospective, controlled study Urology 60 5 846-850 12429313 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01864-2