Surgical residents' perception of simulation training

American Surgeon

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 521-524

  Boyd, K Brian ^a   Olivier, Jake ^b   Salameh, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRAINING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33746573957     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H. The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1324-8.
2. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:23-9.
3. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-63.
4. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2004;240:518-25.
5. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH. Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1077-81.
6. Risucci D, Cohen JA, Garbus JE, et al. The effects of practice and instruction on speed and accuracy during resident acquisition of simulated laparoscopic skills. Curr Surg 2001;58:230-5.
7. Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis. Ann Surg 2005;241:102-9.
8. Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Tebbit C, Quiros RM. Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course. Am J Surg 2005;189:758-61.
9. Ali MR, Mowery Y, Kaplan B, DeMaria EJ. Training the novice in laparoscopy. More challenge is better. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1732-6.
10. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:861-6.
11. Tomulescu V, Popescu I. The use of LapSim virtual reality simulator in the evaluation of laparoscopic surgery skill. Preliminary results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2004;99:523-7.
12. Korndorffer JR Jr, Clayton JL, Tesfay ST, et al. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. J Surg Res 2005;128:114-9.
13. Eriksen JR, Grantcharov T. Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1216-9.
14. Rosser JC Jr, Murayama M, Gabriel NH. Minimally invasive surgical training solutions for the twenty-first century. Surg Clin North Am 2000;80:1607-24.
15. Emken JL, Mcdougall EM, Clayman RV. Training and assessment of laparoscopic skills. JSLS 2004;8:195-9.
16. Feldman LS, Sherman V, Fried GM. Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? Surgery 2004;135:28-42.
17. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Carter FJ. How to select aspirant laparoscopic surgical trainees: establishing concurrent validity comparing Xitact LS500 index performance scores with standardized psychomotor aptitude test battery scores. J Surg Res 2004;121:112-9.