Validation of the NHANES ADL scale in a sample of patients with report of cervical pain: Factor analysis, item response theory analysis, and line item validity

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 929-935

  Cook, Chad ^a   Richardson, Jan ^b   Pietrobon, Ricardo ^b   Braga, Larissa ^c   Silva, Henrique ^b   Turner, Dennis ^d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

^d University of North Carolina ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Functional outcome scale; Functioning; ICF; IRT; NHANES

Indexed keywords

ADL DISABILITY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA BASE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SPINAL PAIN; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NECK PAIN; NUTRITION SURVEYS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746559195     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500404263     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Makela, M and Heliovaara, M and Sievers, K and Impivaara, O and Knekt, P and Aromaa, A. (1991) Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic neck pain in Finland Am J Epidemiol, 134, pp. 1356-1367.
2. Hermann, K and Reese, S. (2001) Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical disorders Phys Ther, 81, pp. 903-914.
3. Lagattuta, F and Falco, F.(2000) Assessment and treatment of cervical spine disorders. In Physical medicine and rehabilitation. (pp. 762-791). Philadelphia: Saunders.
4. Clair, D and Edmondston, S and Allison, G. (2004) Variability in pain intensity, physical and psychological function in non-acute, non-traumatic neck pain Physiother Res Int, 9, pp. 43-54.
5. Jette, A. (2003) Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct J Rehabil Med, 35, pp. 145-149.
6. World Health Organization.Towards a common language for Functioning, Disability, and Health. In. 2002;WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3
7. Patrick, D and Deyo, R. (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life Med Care, 27, pp. S217-S232.
8. Laupacis, A and Wong, C and Churchill, D. (1991) The use of generic and specific quality-of-life measures in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin. The Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group Control Clin Trials, 12(Suppl. 4), pp. 168S-179S.
9. Kantz, M and Harris, W and Levitsky, K and Ware, J and Davies, A. (1992) Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement Med Care, 30(Suppl. 5), pp. MS240-MS252.
10. Stucki, G and Liang, M and Fossel, A and Katz, J. (1995) Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis J Clin Epidemiol, 48(11), pp. 1369-1378.
11. Pietrobon, R and Coeytaux, R and Carey, T and Richardson, W and DeVellis, R. (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction Spine, 27, pp. 515-522.
12. van der Linden, W and Hambleton, R.(1997) Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.
13. Riddle, D and Stratford, P. (1998) Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders Phys Ther, 78, pp. 951-963.
14. NHANES. 1999-2000 Public Data Release File Documentation. In. Accessed 30 November 2004 at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/ NHANES19992000FAQS.htm.
15. Grotle, M and Brox, J and Vollestad, N. (2005) Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires Spine, 30, pp. 130-140.
16. King, J and McGinnis, K and Roberts, M. (2003) Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy Neurosurgery, 52, pp. 113-121.
17. Jette, D and Jette, A. (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments Phys Ther, 76, pp. 930-941.
18. King, J and Roberts, M. (2002) Validity and reliability of the SF-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy J Neurosurg, 97(2), pp. 180-185.
19. Hains, F and Waalen, J and Mior, S. (1998) Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 21, pp. 75-80.
20. Ackelman, B and Lindgren, U. (2002) Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index J Rehabil Med, 34, pp. 284-287.
21. Wheeler, A and Goolkasian, P and Baird, A and Darden, B. (1999) Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: Item analysis, face and criterion-repeated validity Spine, 24, pp. 1290-1299.
22. Million, R and Nilsen, K and Jayson, M and Baker, R. (1981) Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports Ann Rheum Dis, 40, pp. 449-454.
23. Vernon, H and Mior, S. (1992) The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 14, pp. 409-415.
24. Jordan, A and Manniche, C and Mosdal, C and Hindsberger, C. (1998) The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: A study of reliability and validity J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 21, pp. 52-527.