Drug users’ participation in addiction care: Different groups do different things

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 123-132

  Van Der Poel, Agnes ^a   Barendregt, Cas ^a   Van De Mheen, Dike ^a  

^a Addiction Research Institute Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Care agencies; Dependent drug users; Harm reduction; Treatment agencies

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; METHADONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HOMELESSNESS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PROSTITUTION;

EID: 33746558579     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2006.10399836     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barendregt, C.; Van de Mheen, D.; Van der Poel, A. & Spreen, M. 2001. DMS Survey 2000: One sample, two methods. Paper presented at the Netherlands Forum for Alcohol and Drug Research (FADO), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
2. Blanken, P.; Barendregt, C. & Zuidmulder, L. 2000. Community fieldwork: Bringingdrug users into research action. In: J. Fountain (Ed.) Understanding and Responding to Drug Use: The Role of Qualitative Research. Scientific Monograph Series 4. Lisbon: EMCDDA.
3. Chitwood, D.D. & Morningstar, P.C. 1985. Factors which differentiate cocaine users in treatment from nontreatment users. International Journal of the Addictions 20: 449-59.
4. Coumans, M.; Neve, R.J.M. & Van de Mheen, H. 2000. Het Proces van Marginalisering en Verharding in de Drugsscene van Parkstad Limburg; Resultaten van het Drug Monitoring Systeem 1998-2000. (The Process of Marginalization and Toughening in the Drug Scene of Parkstad Limburg; Results ofthe Drug Monitoring System 19982000). Rotterdam: Addiction Research Institute (IVO).
5. Coumans, A.M. & Spreen, M. 2003 Drug use and the role of homelessness in the process of marginalization. Substance Use & Misuse 38 (3-6): 311-38.
6. Cunningham, J.A.; Sobell, L.C.; Sobell, MB.; Agrawal, S. & Toneatlo, T. 1993. Barriers to treatment: Why alcohol and drug abusers delay or never seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors 18: 347-53.
7. De Graaf, I.; Wildschut, J. & Van de Mheen, D. 2000. Utrechtse Druggebruikers: Een Jachtig Bestaan. Verslag van Tweejaar Drug Monitoring Systeem onder Utrechtse (Bijna) Dagelijkse Gebruikers van Heroine, Cocaine en Andere Drugs. [Utrecht Drug Users: A Hurried Existence. Report of Two Years Drug Monitoring System Among (Nearly) Daily Users of Heroin, Crack and Other Drugs in Utrecht]. Rotlerdam: Addiction Research Institute (IVO).
8. De Weert-Van Oene, G.H.; Schippers, G.M.; De Jong, C.A.J. & Schrijvers, A.J.P. 2002. Motivation for treatment in substance-dependent patients. European Addiction Research 8 (2): 2-9.
9. Development Centre Social Addiction Policy. 2000 Ontwikkelprogramma Sociale Verslavingszorg. [Development Program Social Drug Assistance]. Utrecht: GGZ Nederland.
10. Eland-Goossensen, M.A. 1997. Opiate Addicts in and Outside of Treatment; Different Populations? [dissertation] Rotterdam: Addiction Research Institute (1VO) and Erasmus University Rotterdam.
11. Ferri, C.P.; Gossop, M. & Laranjeira, R.R. 2001. High dose cocaine use in Sao Paulo: A comparison of treatment and community samples. Substance Use & Misuse 36 (3): 237-55.
12. Fiorentine, R. & Anglin, M.D. 1994. Perceiving need for drug treatment: A look at eight hypotheses. International Journal of the Addictions 29 (14): 1835-54.
13. Hartnoll, R. 1992. Research and the help-seeking process. British Journal of the Addictions 87: 429-37.
14. Hausser, D.; Kuebler, D. & Dubois-Arber, F. 1999. Characteristics of heroin and cocaine users unknown to treatment agencies. Results from the Swiss Hidden Population Study. Sozial Praeventivmedicine 44: 222-32.
15. Henskens, R. 2004. Grab and Hold. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of an Outreach Treatment Program for Chronic HighRisk Crack Abusers. [disseitation] Rotlerdam: Municipal Health Service Rolterdam.
16. Klingemann, H.K. 1991. The motivation for change from problem alcohol and heroin use. British Journal of the Addictions 86: 727-44.
17. Kuebler, D.; Hausser, D. & Gervasoni, J. 2000. The characteristics of 'new users’ of cocaine and heroin unknown to treatment agencies: Results from the Swiss Hidden Population Study. Addiction 95: 1561-71.
18. Lempens, A.; Van de Mheen, D. & Barendregt, C. 2003. Homeless drug users in Rolterdam, the Netherlands: Profile, way of life and the need for assistance. Substance Use & Misuse 38 (3-6): 341-77.
19. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. 2002. Voortgangsrapportage Drugbeleid 2001-2002. [Progress Report on the Drug Policy in the Netherlands 2001-2002]. Den Haag: Ministry of VWS.
20. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. 1995. Het Nederlandse Drugbeleid: Continuileit en Verandering. [The Dutch Drug Policy: Continuity and Change]. Den Haag: Ministry of VWS.
21. Nwakeze, PC.; Magura, S. & Rosenblum, A. 2002. Drug problem recognition, desire for help, and treatment readiness in a soup kitchen population. Substance Use & Misuse 37 (2): 291-312.
22. Oppenheimer, E.;Sheehan, M. & Taylor, C. 1998. Letting the client speak: Drug misusers and the process of help-seeking. British Journal of the Addictions 83: 635-47.
23. Power, R.; Hartnoll, R. & Chalmers, C. 1992. Help-seeking among illicit drug users: Somedifferences between a treatment and nontreatment sample. International Journal of the Addictions 27 (8): 887-904.
24. Prochaska, J.O.; DiClemente, C.C. & Norcross, J.C. 1992. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist 41 (9): 1102-14.
25. Robson, P. & Bruce, M. 1997. A comparison of visible’ and ‘invisible’ users of amphetamine, cocaine and heroin: Two distinct populations? Addiction 92 (12): 1929-36.
26. Rounsaville, B.J. & Kleber, H.D. 1985. Untreated opiate addicts; How do they differ from those seeking treatment? Archives of General Psychiatry 42: 1012-11.
27. Tucker, J A. 2001. Resolving problems associated with alcohol and drug misuse: Understanding relations between addictive behavior change and the use of services. Substance Use & Misuse 36: 1501-18.
28. Van de Mheen, H. 2002. Vraaggestuurde zorg: Ook mogelijk in de verslavingszorg? [Demand-driven care: also possible in addiction care?]. In: H. Bosselaar; J. Van der Wolk; K. Zwart & H. Spies (Eds.) Vraagsturing, de client aan het roer in de sociale zekerheid en zorg. [Demand-driven care, the client at the helm in social security and care] Tijdschrift voorArbeiden Participatie 23 (3/4): 111-125.
29. Van der Poel, A.; Barendregt, C. & Van de Mheen, D. 2003. Drug consumption rooms in Rotterdam: An explorative description. European Addiction Research 9: 94-100.
30. Van der Poel, A.; Barendregt, C. & Van de Mheen, D. 2000. Druggebruikers en hun Gebruik van de Rotterdamse Verslavingszorg. [Drug Users and their Use of the Rotterdam Addiction Care]. Rotterdam: Addiction Research Institute (IVO).
31. Vitale, S. & Wits, E. 2003. Gezondheidsklachten en Zorgbehoefte van Drugsgebruikende Prostituees in Rotterdam. [Health Complaints and Need for Assistance of Drug Using Prostitutes in Rotterdam] Rotterdam: Addiction Research Institute (IVO).