Demographic management in a federated healthcare environment

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 75, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 671-682

  Roman I ^a   Roa, L M ^a   Reina Tosina, J ^b   Madinabeitia, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Demographic service; EHR; Federated systems; Ontologies; Person identification; Standardization

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC SERVICE; EHR; FEDERATED SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGIES; PERSON IDENTIFICATION;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA MINING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; METHODOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DEMOGRAPHY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 33746551649     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Pavlopoulos S.A., and Delopoulos A.N. Designing and implementing the transition to a fully digital hospital. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 3 1 (1999)
2. Tsiknakis M., Katehakis D.G., and Orphanoudakis S.C. An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information networks. Int. J. Med. Inform. 68 (2002) 3-26
3. D. Kalra, The Synapses Project: final deliverable. 10 chapters, 64 pp. Synapses ODP Information Viewpoint. EU Telematics Application Programme, Brussels, 1998.
4. PICNIC System Architecture, D 2.4, March 2003.
5. Dey D., and Sarkar S. A distance-based approach to entity reconciliation in heterogeneous databases. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 14 3 (2002) 567-582
6. E.-P. Lim, J. Srivastava, Entity identification in database integration: an evidential reasoning approach. International Conference on Next Generation Database. Proceedings of International Conference on Next Generation Database, 1993.
7. Zhao H., and Ram S. Entity identification for heterogeneous database integration-a multiple classifier system approach and empirical evaluation. Inform. Syst. 30 (2005) 119-132
8. Lim E.P., Srivastava J., Prabhakar S., and Richardson J. Entity identification in database integration. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Data Engineering (1993) 294-301
9. Lim E.-P., Srivastava J., and Shekhar S. An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 8 5 (1996) 707-723
10. Lim E.-P., Srivastava J., and Shekhar S. Resolving attribute incompatibility in database integration: an evidential reasoning approach. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Data Engineering (1994) 154-163.
11. Parsons J., and Wand Y. Attribute-based semantic reconciliation of multiple data sources. J. Data Seman. 2800 (2003) 21-47
12. Parsons J., and Wand Y. Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 25 2 (2000) 228-268
13. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health Informatics-Service Architecture (HISA). prEN 12967-1. Part 1. Enterprise viewpoint, 2005.
14. OMG, Healthcare Domain Task Force standards web site. URL: http://www.healthcare.omg.org/Roadmap/corbamed_roadmap.htm. Note: last access December 2005.
15. Wein B.B., Eichelberg M., Ihls A., and Poiseau E. IHE Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise-an update for Information Technology Infrastructure for 2005. Int. Congress Series 1281 (2005) 169-174
16. CEN/TC 251 web site. URL: http://www.centc251.org. Note: last access December 2005.
17. HL7 web site. URL: http://www.hl7.org. Note: last access December 2003.
18. OMG CORBAmed DTF, Person Identification Service (PIDS) Specification. Version 1.1, 2001.
19. J.C.G. de Azcárate, J.M.V. López, Identification, a requirement for the EHR (in Spanish), V SEIS Report, Chap. 4, December 2003.
20. openEHR Foundation, The openEHR EHR_EXTRACT Information Model. Revision: 1.3.5, December 2004.
21. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health informatics-general purpose components for messages-Part 2. Non-clinical prEN 14822-2:2003 (E), 2003.
22. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health informatics-electronic health record communication. prEN 13606-1. Part 1. Reference model, 2004.
23. openEHR Foundation, The openEHR demographic information model. Revision 1.4.7, 2005.
24. W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language. Overview, February 2004.
25. W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language, Guide, 2004. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/. Note: last access September 2005.
26. Gong P., Feng D., and Lim Y.S. An intelligent middleware for dynamic integration of heterogeneous health care applications. Proceedings of the 11th International Multimedia Modeling Conference (2005) 198-205
27. Rector A.L., Solomon W.D., and Nowlan W.A. A terminology server for medical language and medical information systems. Proceedings of IMIA WG6. Geneva, May (1994)
28. Dogac A., Laleci G.B., Kirbas S., Kabak Y., Sinir S.S., Yildiz A., and Gurcan Y. Artemis: deploying semantically enriched Web services in the healthcare domain. Inform. Syst. 31 4-5 (2006) 321-339
29. Rector A.L. Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including OWL. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (2003) 121-128
30. S. Facchinetti, D. Berry, S. Pardon, J. Grimson, Distributed Patient Records require Distributed Patient ID Management: Enter PIDS? PICNIC 2002, Medilink Programme Seminar Series.
31. Forslund D.W., Smith R.K., and Culpepper C.T. Federation of the person identification service between enterprises. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium (2000) 240-244
32. Neame R., and Olson M.J. Security issues arising in establishing a regional health information infrastructure. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73 3 (2004) 285-290
33. ITU-T. Rec. X901-Information technology-open distributed processing-reference model: overview, 1997.
34. openEHR Foundation, The archetype object model. Revision: 0.5.1, 2005.
35. openEHR Foundation, The OpenEHR Archetype System. Revision 0.3.1, December 2003.
36. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health informatics-general purpose information components. Part 1. Overview. prEN 14822-1:2003 (E), 2003.
37. Bernstein K., Bruun-Rasmussen M., Vingtoft S., Andersen S.K., and Nohr C. Modeling and implementing electronic health records in Denmark. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 2-4 (2005) 213-220
38. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health Informatics-Service Architecture (HISA). prEN 12967-2. Part 2. Information viewpoint, 2005.
39. CEN/TC 251.Secretariat: SIS, Health Informatics-Service Architecture (HISA). prEN 12967-3. Part 3. Computational viewpoint, 2005.
40. T. Beale, The GEHR Archetype System (The Good Electronic Health Record Project), 2005. URL: http://www.gehr.org/technical/archetypes/gehr_archetypes.html. Note: last access January 2005.
41. openEHR Foundation, The openEHR Common Information Model. Revision: 2.0rc6, 2005. URL: http://www.openehr.org.