Enantio-differential approach to identify the target cell for glucosyl jasmonate-type leaf-closing factor, by using fluorescence-labeled probe compounds

Tetrahedron

Volumn 62, Issue 37, 2006, Pages 8805-8813

  Nakamura, Yoko ^a   Miyatake, Ryoji ^a   Matsubara, Akira ^a   Kiyota, Hiromasa ^a   Ueda, Minoru ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA DEXTRO GLUCOPYRANOSYL 12 HYDROXYJASMONATE; CELL RECEPTOR; FLUORESCENT DYE; JASMONIC ACID; JASMONIC ACID METHYL ESTER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALBIZZIA; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; ENANTIOMER; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PLANT CELL; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TARGET CELL;

ALBIZIA;

EID: 33746551154     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.06.092     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Darwin C. The Power of Movement in Plants. Third Thousand (1882), John Murray, London
2. In: Satter R.L., Gorton H.L., and Vogelmann T.C. (Eds). The Pulvinus: Motor Organ for Leaf Movement (1990), American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Maryland, USA
3. Satter R.L., and Galston A.W. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32 (1981) 83-110
4. Satter R.L., and Moran N. Physiol. Plant. 72 (1998) 816-820
5. Moshelion M., and Moran N. Plant Physiol. 124 (2000) 911-919
6. Moshelion M., Becker D., Biela A., Uehlein N., Hedrich R., Otto B., Levi H., Moran N., and Kaldenhoff R. Plant Physiol. 128 (2002) 634-642
7. Moshelion M., Becker D., Czempinski K., Mulleer-Roeber B., Attali B., Hedrich R., and Moran N. Plant Cell 14 (2002) 727-739
8. Ueda M., and Yamamura S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 1400-1414
9. Ueda M., Shigemori H., Sata N., and Yamamura S. Phytochemistry 53 (2000) 39-44
10. Ueda M., Okazaki M., Ueda K., and Yamamura S. Tetrahedron 56 (2000) 8101-8105
11. Ueda M., Tashiro C., and Yamamura S. Tetrahedron Lett. 38 (1997) 3253-3256
12. Nagano H., Kato E., Yamamura S., and Ueda M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1 (2003) 3186-3192
13. Nakamura Y., Kiyota H., Kumagai T., and Ueda M. Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 2893-2897
14. Sugimoto T., Yamamura S., and Ueda M. Chem. Lett. (2002) 1118-1119
15. Kiyota H., Higashi H., koike T., and Oritani T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 12 (2001) 1035-1038
16. Yoshihara T., Omer E.A., Koshino H., Sakamura S., Kikuta Y., and Koda Y. Agric. Biol. Chem. 61 (1989) 1724-1728
17. Ueda M., Sawai Y., Wada Y., and Yamamura S. Tetrahedron 56 (2000) 5123-5130
18. Ueda M., Wada Y., and Yamamura S. Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 3869-3872
19. Sato H., Inada M., Sugimoto T., Kato N., and Ueda M. Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 5537-5541
20. Dathe W., Schindler C., Schneider G., Schmidt J., Porzel A., Jensen E., and Yamaguchi I. Phytochemistry 30 (1991) 1909-1914
21. Asamitsu Y., Nakamura Y., Ueda M., Kuwahara S., and Kiyota H. Chem. Biodivers. 3 (2006) 654-659
22. Matsuura, H; Obara, N.; Yoshihara, T. Abstract of Papers, 40th Symposium on the Chemistry of Natural Products, Fukuoka, Japan, Oct 7-9, 1998; pp 323-328.
23. Kato, N.; Inada, M.; Sato, H.; Miyatake, R.; Kumagai, T.; Ueda, M. Tetrahedron, in press.
24. -5 M for A. saman and A. lebbeck. This would be because the leaves of A. saman and A. lebbeck are larger than those of A. julibrissin.